>> As no
>> SCO install is available (and I understand why), I'm kinda between the
>> rock
>> and the hard place.
>
>Well, I don't see why one would bother with SCO nowadays. However, if you
>want to do it, be our guest :)
It's not a matter of wanting to, it's a matter of having to. Business
de
Op Tue, 6 Feb 2007, schreef Marco van de Voort:
> > Marco van de Voort schrieb:
> > >
> > > This ranges from Windows 64-bit
> >
> > I use and maintain Win64 daily?
>
> So does Peter with Solaris. And Tomas(/Daniel?) with OS/2. But it rather
> limited compared to the core platforms (even OS X
> Marco van de Voort schrieb:
> >
> > This ranges from Windows 64-bit
>
> I use and maintain Win64 daily?
So does Peter with Solaris. And Tomas(/Daniel?) with OS/2. But it rather
limited compared to the core platforms (even OS X, e.g. Jonas, Vincent and
me all have macs)
There is a reason why
Marco van de Voort schrieb:
>
> This ranges from Windows 64-bit
I use and maintain Win64 daily?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
> Op Mon, 5 Feb 2007, schreef Daaave:
> > As no
> > SCO install is available (and I understand why), I'm kinda between the rock
> > and the hard place.
>
> Well, I don't see why one would bother with SCO nowadays. However, if you
> want to do it, be our guest :)
Didn't Carl mess with SCO at some
On 05 Feb 2007, at 20:52, Daaave wrote:
However -- Am I correct in my understanding that I need the FPC
compiler to
compile the FPC compiler?
Yes.
If so, how far back to I have to go version-wise
to get a compiler that doesn't require the FPC compiler to
compile? As no
SCO install is a
Op Mon, 5 Feb 2007, schreef Daaave:
>
> We're presently using an *old* (DOS) Pascal compiler on SCO Unix.
> Unfortunately, we've reached the end of the usable life of this compiler.
> The replacement we've provisionally chosen is FPC.
>
> I've been using the Windows version of the IDE and c
Daaave schrieb:
> We're presently using an *old* (DOS) Pascal compiler on SCO Unix.
> Unfortunately, we've reached the end of the usable life of this compiler.
> The replacement we've provisionally chosen is FPC.
>
> I've been using the Windows version of the IDE and compiler to convert my
> so
We're presently using an *old* (DOS) Pascal compiler on SCO Unix.
Unfortunately, we've reached the end of the usable life of this compiler.
The replacement we've provisionally chosen is FPC.
I've been using the Windows version of the IDE and compiler to convert my
source files, and am quite pl
