Re: [fpc-pascal] Fpc for ARM HF

On 25/06/2019 03:03, Fabio Luis Girardi wrote: > Someone knows why, programs > compiled to ARM HF target have to be linked with libc to be displayed by > readelf -a as a ARM HF binary? > > If the program isn't linked with libc, it's displayed as ARM soft float > by readelf. Someone have a explanat

Re: [fpc-pascal] Fpc for ARM HF

Nobody? Em Seg, 24 de jun de 2019 22:03, Fabio Luis Girardi escreveu: > Hi all! > > Someone knows why, programs > compiled to ARM HF target have to be linked with libc to be displayed by > readelf -a as a ARM HF binary? > > If the program isn't linked with libc, it's displayed as ARM soft float

[fpc-pascal] Fpc for ARM HF

Hi all! Someone knows why, programs compiled to ARM HF target have to be linked with libc to be displayed by readelf -a as a ARM HF binary? If the program isn't linked with libc, it's displayed as ARM soft float by readelf. Someone have a explanation about this behavior? Should I report a bug? __

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpc for ARM on STM32F103

On So, 2017-01-22 at 22:05 +0100, Florian Klämpfl wrote: > Am 22.01.2017 um 21:43 schrieb Marc Santhoff: > > On So, 2017-01-22 at 21:20 +0100, Florian Klämpfl wrote: > >> Am 22.01.2017 um 19:33 schrieb Marc Santhoff: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I'd like to know if the floating point hardware on STM32F103

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpc for ARM on STM32F103

Am 22.01.2017 um 21:43 schrieb Marc Santhoff: > On So, 2017-01-22 at 21:20 +0100, Florian Klämpfl wrote: >> Am 22.01.2017 um 19:33 schrieb Marc Santhoff: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'd like to know if the floating point hardware on STM32F103 >> >> What floating point hardware does it have? According to a quic

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpc for ARM on STM32F103

On So, 2017-01-22 at 21:20 +0100, Florian Klämpfl wrote: > Am 22.01.2017 um 19:33 schrieb Marc Santhoff: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to know if the floating point hardware on STM32F103 > > What floating point hardware does it have? According to a quick search, it is > a Cortex-M3 which has > no har

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpc for ARM on STM32F103

Am 22.01.2017 um 19:33 schrieb Marc Santhoff: > Hi, > > I'd like to know if the floating point hardware on STM32F103 What floating point hardware does it have? According to a quick search, it is a Cortex-M3 which has no hardware floating point support? > is > supported by the fpc cross compiler

[fpc-pascal] fpc for ARM on STM32F103

Hi, I'd like to know if the floating point hardware on STM32F103 is supported by the fpc cross compiler. ARmv7 this is according to: http://j-software.dk/stm32f103.php Will fpc use floating point support on those SoCs? TIA, Marc ___ fpc-pascal maill

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for ARM

Is there an embedded web-server that would run on the ARM machine? I use this one from Synapse (work on openWRT and Android) -- Darek ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-p

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for ARM

In our previous episode, Juha Manninen said: > I ran "apt-get install binutils" in the already installed Ubuntu and it > worked. > I have understood ARM also supports many instruction sets like Thumb and > Thumb-2. > I have no idea which one is running now, but it is not important because it > work

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for ARM

2011/12/19 Marco van de Voort > FreeBSD and Linux x86 and x86_64 have internal assembler, but not linker. > Though the FreeBSD/x86_64 internal assembler is only enable in trunk afaik. > > Be careful with binutils on ARM though, there are multiple ABIs, and the > installed ones must match the devi

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for ARM

In our previous episode, Thomas Schatzl said: > > Does it mean an assembler is always needed with ARM? In my > > understanding x86 based PCs don't need a separate assembler with FPC. > > "apt-get install as" didn't install anything. > > Afaik only the Windows platforms have an internal assembler a

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for ARM

Hi, On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 13:16 +0200, Juha Manninen wrote: > 2011/11/28 Henry Vermaak > There is an arm release for 2.6.0rc1, but it was built using > old binutils (last time I checked, at least): > > ftp://freepascal.stack.nl/pub/fpc/beta/2.6.0-rc1/arm-linux/ >

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for ARM

On 19/12/11 11:16, Juha Manninen wrote: The compiler itself works but assembler is missing. See : --- root@ubuntu:/usr/share/doc/fpc-2.6.0/examples/text# fpc hello.pp Free Pascal Compiler version 2.6.0rc1 [2011/10/20] for arm Copyright (c) 1993-2011 by Florian Klaempfl and others Target OS: Linux

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for ARM

2011/11/28 Henry Vermaak > There is an arm release for 2.6.0rc1, but it was built using old binutils > (last time I checked, at least): > > ftp://freepascal.stack.nl/pub/**fpc/beta/2.6.0-rc1/arm-linux/ > I finally got into installing a

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for ARM

In our previous episode, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho said: > wrote: > > I don't even know what means?eabi4 and?eabi5. > > I'm not sure what it means exactly either, but for example Android no > longer supports eabi 4, so it looks obsolete. I use eabi 5 for my > Android development. It's obsolete

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for ARM

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Juha Manninen wrote: > I don't even know what means eabi4 and eabi5. I'm not sure what it means exactly either, but for example Android no longer supports eabi 4, so it looks obsolete. I use eabi 5 for my Android development. -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho _

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for ARM

On 28/11/11 22:11, Thomas Schatzl wrote: Hi, Am 28.11.2011 15:18, schrieb Henry Vermaak: On 28/11/11 13:41, Juha Manninen wrote: Hi Is FPC 2.2.2 really the latest native release for ARM processors? I guess it can build the more recent versions. (?) There is an arm release for 2.6.0rc1, but

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for ARM

In our previous episode, Thomas Schatzl said: > > What OS/version are you using? Maybe some OS setup issue? On an HP > Touchpad and a Sheevaplug-like system, which are both eabi5, the > bootstrap compiler and fpc produced executables work just fine. (Sheeva's are shipped with a default eabi4, t

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for ARM

2011/11/29 Thomas Schatzl > There is an arm release for 2.6.0rc1, but it was built using old >> binutils (last time I checked, at least): >> >> ftp://freepascal.stack.nl/pub/**fpc/beta/2.6.0-rc1/arm-linux/ >> > > What OS/version are you

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for ARM

Hi, Am 28.11.2011 15:18, schrieb Henry Vermaak: On 28/11/11 13:41, Juha Manninen wrote: Hi Is FPC 2.2.2 really the latest native release for ARM processors? I guess it can build the more recent versions. (?) There is an arm release for 2.6.0rc1, but it was built using old binutils (last time

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for ARM

On 28/11/11 13:41, Juha Manninen wrote: Hi Is FPC 2.2.2 really the latest native release for ARM processors? I guess it can build the more recent versions. (?) There is an arm release for 2.6.0rc1, but it was built using old binutils (last time I checked, at least): ftp://freepascal.stack.n

[fpc-pascal] FPC for ARM

Hi Is FPC 2.2.2 really the latest native release for ARM processors? I guess it can build the more recent versions. (?) In school we have an interesting project "Developing Open Source Systems" where the idea is to make an internet router out of small DreamPlug computer by Globalscale Technologie

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC for ARM-7

On 23-07-2011 20:34, Andreas Berger wrote: I am hoping to use FPC for ARM-7, compiling and debugging on a Windows machine. At the moment I am using Keil C + ULink2. Is it possible to use FPC from Windows and debug via the ULink2? I'm sure it should be possible. FPC can generate code for ARM7, and

[fpc-pascal] FPC for ARM-7

I am hoping to use FPC for ARM-7, compiling and debugging on a Windows machine. At the moment I am using Keil C + ULink2. Is it possible to use FPC from Windows and debug via the ULink2? Regards, Andreas ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.f

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpc for arm linux

On 25 apr 2007, at 14:07, Jose Pascual wrote: I have found libc.ppu in i386 linux version but arm linux version? Correct. Where can I find it? Nowhere. or how can I generate it (for arm linux)? You can't. It is full of i386-specific code, and is only included for Kylix compatibility

Re: [fpc-pascal] fpc for arm linux

Op Wed, 25 Apr 2007, schreef Jose Pascual: > Hi, > > I have found libc.ppu in i386 linux version but arm linux version? > Where can I find it? or how can I generate it (for arm linux)? Due to portability issues, libc is i386 only. Daniël___ fpc-pasc

[fpc-pascal] fpc for arm linux

Hi, I have found libc.ppu in i386 linux version but arm linux version? Where can I find it? or how can I generate it (for arm linux)? thank you in advanced best regards Jose Pascual ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://

[fpc-pascal] fpc for ARM on FreeBSD

Hi, since I know fpc has a code generator for ARM CPUs and is running on FreeBSD I'd like to know: What would be needed to make the compiled programm run on FreeBSD for ARM? If there is some real porting work to do (as an opposite of "re-configuration"), how much time may that take? The FreeBSD

[fpc-pascal]FPC for ARM beta "link.res" problem

Hi, FPC for ARM generate during compilation a "link.res" for linking stage. Inside this link there's ... /usr/local/lib/fpc/1.9.5/cross/arm-linux/units/rtl/cprt0.o ... with cprt0.o LD can't link sucessfully, but changing cprt0.o by prt0.o everything work okey, even program run correctly. Problem

[fpc-pascal]FPC for ARM beta

Hi, I have downloaded FPC for ARM beta 1.9.3 from freepascal ftp, when I compile some example I have found problem in linking phase, Linking modulo_arm /usr/local/arm/arm-linux/gcc-3.3.3-glibc-2.2.5/arm-linux/bin/ld: warning: cannot fin