On Fri, January 11, 2008 16:41, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>
>> As far as I know .pp is the old 'classical' file extension. .pas is
>> the new more widely know (I think) extension for Object Pascal. I
>> prefer .pas personally.
>
> There is nothing
On 11 Jan 2008, at 16:41, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
As far as I know .pp is the old 'classical' file extension. .pas is
the new more widely know (I think) extension for Object Pascal. I
prefer .pas personally.
There is nothing 'classical' or
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> As far as I know .pp is the old 'classical' file extension. .pas is
> the new more widely know (I think) extension for Object Pascal. I
> prefer .pas personally.
There is nothing 'classical' or 'new' about either extension.
.pp was in accordanc
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:55:40 +
Matt Emson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Was ".pp" the UNIX standard?
Suspecting the analogy with .c and .cc, I guess it was .p in the non-OO
era and .pp with objects.
John
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
As far as I know .pp is the old 'classical' file extension. .pas is
the new more widely know (I think) extension for Object Pascal. I
prefer .pas personally.
I had never seen ".pp" before FPC. In all the Delphi/Turbo Pascal I'd
used, it was always ".pas". On the M
As far as I know .pp is the old 'classical' file extension. .pas is
the new more widely know (I think) extension for Object Pascal. I
prefer .pas personally.
FPC doesn't mind which one you use.
Regards,
- Graeme -
On 11/01/2008, Damien Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am starting a n
I am starting a new project and I worry about filename conventions.
It is possible to use .pp or .pas for fpc source files.
Lazarus creates .pas files AFAIK. The project will be a console
application.
Is there some existing conventions (from history or something else) or
we totally don't c
