On 23/05/2011 13:52, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Monday 23 May 2011 12:23:02 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
In our previous episode, Rainer Stratmann said:
Would it be possible to put all the needed libraries in on
~/fpc_install_xxx directory with all other programs so that lazarus looks
there firs
On Mon, 23 May 2011 14:52:10 +0200
Rainer Stratmann wrote:
> Am Monday 23 May 2011 12:23:02 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> > In our previous episode, Rainer Stratmann said:
> > > > package systems "should" bring them in if they are missing.
> > > >
> > > > And the qtintf library is mostly likely n
On Mon, 23 May 2011 14:52:10 +0200
Rainer Stratmann wrote:
> Am Monday 23 May 2011 12:23:02 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> > In our previous episode, Rainer Stratmann said:
> > > > package systems "should" bring them in if they are missing.
> > > >
> > > > And the qtintf library is mostly likely n
Am Monday 23 May 2011 12:23:02 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> In our previous episode, Rainer Stratmann said:
> > > package systems "should" bring them in if they are missing.
> > >
> > > And the qtintf library is mostly likely not available.
> >
> > Would it be possible to put all the needed librar
In our previous episode, Rainer Stratmann said:
> > package systems "should" bring them in if they are missing.
> >
> > And the qtintf library is mostly likely not available.
>
> Would it be possible to put all the needed libraries in on ~/fpc_install_xxx
> directory with all other programs so th
Am Monday 23 May 2011 09:38:12 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> In our previous episode, Rainer Stratmann said:
> > > > You mean the C Libraries?
> > > > Aren't they already there in the Linux distribution?
> > >
> > > No.
> >
> > But the libraries for X-Window are included I found out.
>
> Not guaran
In our previous episode, Rainer Stratmann said:
> > > You mean the C Libraries?
> > > Aren't they already there in the Linux distribution?
> >
> > No.
> But the libraries for X-Window are included I found out.
Not guaranteed. That's what the dependancies are for, working via the
package systems "s
On 5/22/2011 5:47 PM, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Sunday 22 May 2011 23:43:47 schrieb Robert Wolfe:
On 5/22/2011 5:33 PM, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Sunday 22 May 2011 23:27:03 schrieb Robert Wolfe:
The installer should do this already. I build my own 2.5.1 binaries and
installer once a week f
Am Sunday 22 May 2011 23:47:38 schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
> I meant flavors like: Build for i386 or x86_64, for gtk2 or qt, for
> which Linux distros, for single or multi user, ...
Of course the best would be every possible flavor.
Also the best would be that it is compatible to all Linux distros.
On Sun, 22 May 2011 23:29:26 +0200
Rainer Stratmann wrote:
> Am Sunday 22 May 2011 23:12:34 schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
> > On Sun, 22 May 2011 15:32:05 +0200
> >
> > Rainer Stratmann wrote:
> > > For userfriendly reasons I suggest one directory with all necessary Files
> > > in a zip File.
> > >
Am Sunday 22 May 2011 23:43:47 schrieb Robert Wolfe:
> On 5/22/2011 5:33 PM, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
> > Am Sunday 22 May 2011 23:27:03 schrieb Robert Wolfe:
> >> The installer should do this already. I build my own 2.5.1 binaries and
> >> installer once a week from the source snapshots and upgrad
On 5/22/2011 5:33 PM, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Sunday 22 May 2011 23:27:03 schrieb Robert Wolfe:
The installer should do this already. I build my own 2.5.1 binaries and
installer once a week from the source snapshots and upgrade my existing
install using the installer I've built. My installe
Am Sunday 22 May 2011 23:27:03 schrieb Robert Wolfe:
> The installer should do this already. I build my own 2.5.1 binaries and
> installer once a week from the source snapshots and upgrade my existing
> install using the installer I've built. My installer installs and
> updates everything provide
Am Sunday 22 May 2011 23:12:34 schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
> On Sun, 22 May 2011 15:32:05 +0200
>
> Rainer Stratmann wrote:
> > For userfriendly reasons I suggest one directory with all necessary Files
> > in a zip File.
> >
> > Advantages:
> > Easy install, just unzip in a new directory.
> > Everyt
On 5/22/2011 5:12 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2011 15:32:05 +0200
Rainer Stratmann wrote:
For userfriendly reasons I suggest one directory with all necessary Files in a
zip File.
Advantages:
Easy install, just unzip in a new directory.
Everything is separate from earlyer versio
On Sun, 22 May 2011 15:32:05 +0200
Rainer Stratmann wrote:
> For userfriendly reasons I suggest one directory with all necessary Files in
> a
> zip File.
>
> Advantages:
> Easy install, just unzip in a new directory.
> Everything is separate from earlyer versions, so testing is easy.
>
> Disa
For userfriendly reasons I suggest one directory with all necessary Files in a
zip File.
Advantages:
Easy install, just unzip in a new directory.
Everything is separate from earlyer versions, so testing is easy.
Disadvantages:
?
___
fpc-pascal maillist
17 matches
Mail list logo
