On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Paul Ishenin wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I really doubt it:
home: >ldd lazarus | grep libX
libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x7fe7531d8000)
libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x7fe7508df000)
libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXren
Hello Roland
Thanks for the committ andd the tar ball.. I've set aside next weekend to
explore and begin testing it. Perhpas others in the group are like me and
putting the tarball on their 'To-Do' list.
Prince
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Roland Schaefer <
roland.schae...@fu-berlin.de> wrot
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I really doubt it:
home: >ldd lazarus | grep libX
libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x7fe7531d8000)
libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x7fe7508df000)
libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x7fe7506d5000)
libXin
On Monday 01 June 2009 17:06:39 Paul Ishenin wrote:
> Try to think whether lazarus need 10 widgetsets 30% ready or 3
> widgetsets 100% ready? I would choose last.
I strongly agree, there are too many half-finished
... it would be nice to ... and therefore useless projects.
Qt can do framebuffer a
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>> As Micha said in his reply, since Gtk can be used with DFB without X,
>> you can have Lazarus w/o X anyway.
>
> I really doubt it:
>
> home: >ldd lazarus | grep libX
> libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x7fe7531d8000)
> libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib
Michael Van Canneyt schreef:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Henry Vermaak wrote:
2009/6/1 Michael Van Canneyt :
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Roland Schaefer wrote:
As Micha said in his reply, since Gtk can be used with DFB without X,
you can have Lazarus w/o X anyway.
I really doubt it:
http://www.direc
2009/6/1 Michael Van Canneyt :
>> As Micha said in his reply, since Gtk can be used with DFB without X,
>> you can have Lazarus w/o X anyway.
>
> I really doubt it:
>
> home: >ldd lazarus | grep libX
> libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x7fe7531d8000)
As with fpGUI, most of the other
2009/6/1 Henry Vermaak :
> sometimes too heavy (never mind gtk2). an even better idea might be
> to add a directfb back-end for fpgui, which is custom drawn, too.
I would vote for this one as well. Somebody already converted fpGUI to
DOS, but that was a while back and they changed unit names etc,
2009/6/1 Michael Van Canneyt :
>
> GTK, yes. Lazarus: no. There are direct calls to X.
hmm, do they require the server to run?
henry
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Henry Vermaak wrote:
2009/6/1 Michael Van Canneyt :
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Roland Schaefer wrote:
As Micha said in his reply, since Gtk can be used with DFB without X,
you can have Lazarus w/o X anyway.
I really doubt it:
http://www.directfb.org/wiki/index.php/Project
2009/6/1 Michael Van Canneyt :
>
>
> On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Roland Schaefer wrote:
>
>> As Micha said in his reply, since Gtk can be used with DFB without X,
>> you can have Lazarus w/o X anyway.
>
> I really doubt it:
http://www.directfb.org/wiki/index.php/Projects:GTK_on_DirectFB
henry
___
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Roland Schaefer wrote:
As Micha said in his reply, since Gtk can be used with DFB without X,
you can have Lazarus w/o X anyway.
I really doubt it:
home: >ldd lazarus | grep libX
libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x7fe7531d8000)
libXext.so.6 => /usr
2009/6/1 Paul Ishenin :
>
> Try to think whether lazarus need 10 widgetsets 30% ready or 3 widgetsets
> 100% ready? I would choose last.
depends on the application. if i have an embedded board that can't
run your 100% completed widget sets because they're too heavy, it's of
no use to me. if ther
2009/6/1 Roland Schaefer :
> As Micha said in his reply, since Gtk can be used with DFB without X,
> you can have Lazarus w/o X anyway.
>
> Apart from that, I think it would be absolutely feasible to go without
> Gtk and use DFB directly. I'm only working with fpc, not Lazarus, so I
> am not sure w
Roland Schaefer wrote:
As Micha said in his reply, since Gtk can be used with DFB without X,
you can have Lazarus w/o X anyway.
Apart from that, I think it would be absolutely feasible to go without
Gtk and use DFB directly. I'm only working with fpc, not Lazarus, so I
am not sure what it takes
As Micha said in his reply, since Gtk can be used with DFB without X,
you can have Lazarus w/o X anyway.
Apart from that, I think it would be absolutely feasible to go without
Gtk and use DFB directly. I'm only working with fpc, not Lazarus, so I
am not sure what it takes to develop a widgetset fo
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
The known major bugs of previous SVN versions have beeen fixed. We're
now starting to actually use DFB in our project. Reports (bugs or
anything) are thus highly appreciated.
Do you think it would be feasible to use this as a basis for a Lazarus
widgetset ?
Lazarus
On Sun, 31 May 2009, Roland Schaefer wrote:
Hello. There wasn't much feedback to our previous anouncement. Anyway,
now there is an FPC-DirectFB tarball which can be downloaded from our
SourceForge page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/wiseslap/ Please have
DFB 1.0.1 or higher installed. One sa
Hello. There wasn't much feedback to our previous anouncement. Anyway,
now there is an FPC-DirectFB tarball which can be downloaded from our
SourceForge page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/wiseslap/ Please have
DFB 1.0.1 or higher installed. One sample program is included.
The known major bugs o
19 matches
Mail list logo
