leledumbo wrote:
Peter Vreman wrote:
The idea to implement this and reuse some Lazarus code has been around for
a couple of years. But
it is not an easy task after a couple of quick investigations. That is
also the reason why it has
not been started yet. You are welcome to implement such an int
Peter Vreman wrote:
>
> The idea to implement this and reuse some Lazarus code has been around for
> a couple of years. But
> it is not an easy task after a couple of quick investigations. That is
> also the reason why it has
> not been started yet. You are welcome to implement such an interface
>
> FP IDE needs to link to libgdb and all of its dependencies in order to have
> debugger support. OTOH, Lazarus interacts to gdb via TProcess. FP IDE
> approach would be faster but also inextensible and less maintainable. When
> there's a problem with the libgdb (i.e. the library is buggy), the w
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 04.42:49 leledumbo wrote:
> FP IDE needs to link to libgdb and all of its dependencies in order to have
> debugger support. OTOH, Lazarus interacts to gdb via TProcess. FP IDE
> approach would be faster but also inextensible and less maintainable. When
> there's a pro
FP IDE needs to link to libgdb and all of its dependencies in order to have
debugger support. OTOH, Lazarus interacts to gdb via TProcess. FP IDE
approach would be faster but also inextensible and less maintainable. When
there's a problem with the libgdb (i.e. the library is buggy), the whole IDE
