On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Ryan Joseph wrote:
On Sep 12, 2017, at 4:46 PM, Maciej Izak wrote:
Please check example at : packages\rtl-generics\examples\tcomparer\tcomparerproject.lpr
Thanks. What is the & here? TCompare.&String(Left.Name, Right.Name);
I don’t think I’ve ever seen that befor
> On Sep 12, 2017, at 4:46 PM, Maciej Izak wrote:
>
> Please check example at :
> packages\rtl-generics\examples\tcomparer\tcomparerproject.lpr
Thanks. What is the & here? TCompare.&String(Left.Name, Right.Name);
I don’t think I’ve ever seen that before.
Regards,
Ryan Joseph
_
2017-09-12 7:59 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth via fpc-pascal <
fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org>:
> You could try to use the TEqualityComparer<> (or so) types from the
> rtl-generics package (don't know in which unit exactly they are ^^') as
> those can work with records without operator overloads.
>
Gener
2017-09-12 11:07 GMT+02:00 Ryan Joseph :
>
> Do any examples of how to use the class exist? I searched around and
> couldn’t find a single snippet even though it appears to exist in Delphi.
Please check example at :
packages\rtl-generics\examples\tcomparer\tcomparerproject.lpr
--
Best regards,
> On Sep 12, 2017, at 12:59 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> You could try to use the TEqualityComparer<> (or so) types from the
> rtl-generics package (don't know in which unit exactly they are ^^') as those
> can work with records without operator overloads.
>
Do any examples of
Am 12.09.2017 06:49 schrieb "Ryan Joseph" :
>
> This is a common pattern I’m finding when working with generics in FPC.
In the example below there is an equals comparison that needs to be checked
but for some types such as records there is no default operator overload so
I need to add one for every
This is a common pattern I’m finding when working with generics in FPC. In the
example below there is an equals comparison that needs to be checked but for
some types such as records there is no default operator overload so I need to
add one for every record that will be specialized in the class
