On 06/02/2018 02:01 AM, Ryan Joseph wrote:
So it looks like my idea wasn’t that crazy after all. ;)
just because more than one person comes up with the same or similar idea does
not mean that it is not crazy or worse ;) ;) ;)
--
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval
> On Jun 2, 2018, at 2:54 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
> wrote:
>
> Personally, I don't understand the obsession with language features.
> If anything, I would make the language more simple. But this is just me
> swimming against the current.
Ironically I totally agree but it’s so difficult to de
On Sat, 2 Jun 2018, Ryan Joseph wrote:
On Jun 2, 2018, at 1:44 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
2 remarks:
1. It's only for arrays
2. It's for fixed-length arrays
So you can do this in FPC today.
Thirdly, you have objects which can be allocated on the stack, or advanced
records.
Plenty o
> On Jun 2, 2018, at 1:44 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
> wrote:
>
> 2 remarks:
> 1. It's only for arrays
> 2. It's for fixed-length arrays
>
> So you can do this in FPC today.
>
> Thirdly, you have objects which can be allocated on the stack, or advanced
> records.
>
> Plenty of choice for you.
On Sat, 2 Jun 2018, Ryan Joseph wrote:
As a sanity check for myself if you remember a while ago I posted about an idea
for “stack aliases” to override the memory allocation for classes. No one
really liked the idea and lots of potential safety concerns were raised (fair
criticisms).
By ran
As a sanity check for myself if you remember a while ago I posted about an idea
for “stack aliases” to override the memory allocation for classes. No one
really liked the idea and lots of potential safety concerns were raised (fair
criticisms).
By random chance today I came upon this feature of
