Re: [fpc-pascal] Brook 1.0 - A new framework for web was born

michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote: On Sun, 16 Dec 2012, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: On 15/12/2012 21:22, Sven Barth wrote: Maybe because the authors prefered inline comments instead of fpdoc's XML files... A shame, because the more detailed the documentation, the more it obfuscates the code. e

Re: [fpc-pascal] Brook 1.0 - A new framework for web was born

On Sun, 16 Dec 2012, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: On 15/12/2012 21:22, Sven Barth wrote: Maybe because the authors prefered inline comments instead of fpdoc's XML files... A shame, because the more detailed the documentation, the more it obfuscates the code. eg: Documentation Insight, a pop

Re: [fpc-pascal] Brook 1.0 - A new framework for web was born

On 15/12/2012 21:22, Sven Barth wrote: Maybe because the authors prefered inline comments instead of fpdoc's XML files... A shame, because the more detailed the documentation, the more it obfuscates the code. eg: Documentation Insight, a popular Delphi IDE plugin for documenting frameworks

Re: [fpc-pascal] Brook 1.0 - A new framework for web was born

2012/12/16 Sven Barth > On 15.12.2012 04:24, silvioprog wrote: > >> More than 15,000 lines of source code, more than 90 test cases, more >> than one year of work. Today, a new framework for web development was >> born. It's name is Brook and its nice features are available for you. >> I thank the

Re: [fpc-pascal] Brook 1.0 - A new framework for web was born

On 15.12.2012 04:24, silvioprog wrote: More than 15,000 lines of source code, more than 90 test cases, more than one year of work. Today, a new framework for web development was born. It's name is Brook and its nice features are available for you. I thank the FPWeb, the Freespider, the Powtils, t

Re: [fpc-pascal] Brook 1.0 - A new framework for web was born

2012/12/15 Sven Barth > On 15.12.2012 18:16, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > >> On 15/12/12 17:08, Michalis Kamburelis wrote: >> >>> >>> And the improvements will be (I'm counting on it :) contributed back to >>> PasDoc and available in it's next version, >>> >> >> >> More worrying is why fpdoc was no

Re: [fpc-pascal] Brook 1.0 - A new framework for web was born

2012/12/15 Michalis Kamburelis > luciano de souza wrote: > >> Yes, there is a very nice tool. Its name is Pasdoc. Take a look here: >> http://sourceforge.net/**projects/pasdoc/ >> For this project, the author has changed the source code of Pasdoc. >> Origi

Re: [fpc-pascal] Brook 1.0 - A new framework for web was born

On 15.12.2012 18:16, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: On 15/12/12 17:08, Michalis Kamburelis wrote: And the improvements will be (I'm counting on it :) contributed back to PasDoc and available in it's next version, More worrying is why fpdoc was not used. ;-) Maybe because the authors prefered inl

Re: [fpc-pascal] Brook 1.0 - A new framework for web was born

On 15/12/12 17:08, Michalis Kamburelis wrote: > > And the improvements will be (I'm counting on it :) contributed back to > PasDoc and available in it's next version, More worrying is why fpdoc was not used. ;-) Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Fre

Re: [fpc-pascal] Brook 1.0 - A new framework for web was born

luciano de souza wrote: Yes, there is a very nice tool. Its name is Pasdoc. Take a look here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pasdoc/ For this project, the author has changed the source code of Pasdoc. Originally, it's compatible only with HTML 4, but the documentation was released in HTML 5.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Brook 1.0 - A new framework for web was born

On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:50 PM, luciano de souza wrote: > Yes, there is a very nice tool. Its name is Pasdoc. Take a look here: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/pasdoc/ > For this project, the author has changed the source code of Pasdoc. > Originally, it's compatible only with HTML 4, but the

Re: [fpc-pascal] Brook 1.0 - A new framework for web was born

Yes, there is a very nice tool. Its name is Pasdoc. Take a look here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pasdoc/ For this project, the author has changed the source code of Pasdoc. Originally, it's compatible only with HTML 4, but the documentation was released in HTML 5. 2012/12/15, Juha Manninen :

Re: [fpc-pascal] Brook 1.0 - A new framework for web was born

May I ask how were the hierarchy and dependency graps generated? Is there a tool that can do it? Juha ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Brook 1.0 - A new framework for web was born

It would be very intersting, but in this moment, it would mean a lost of focus. The existant web servers are fortunately reliable. So Brook has prefered to invest in another aspects. For example, the route handling. With one line, you can register a pattern to calll your URLs: action1.register('/

Re: [fpc-pascal] Brook 1.0 - A new framework for web was born

I thought the webserver itself was programmed in FreePascal... Am Saturday 15 December 2012 09:59:48 schrieb luciano de souza: > No, Brook works with any web server. Apache is only the an example and > the preference of the author. > > 2012/12/15, silvioprog : > > Hello all, > > > > More than 15,0

Re: [fpc-pascal] Brook 1.0 - A new framework for web was born

No, Brook works with any web server. Apache is only the an example and the preference of the author. 2012/12/15, silvioprog : > Hello all, > > More than 15,000 lines of source code, more than 90 test cases, more than > one year of work. Today, a new framework for web development was born. It's >

Re: [fpc-pascal] Brook 1.0 - A new framework for web was born

Does it only work with Apache? Am Saturday 15 December 2012 04:24:48 schrieb silvioprog: > Hello all, > > More than 15,000 lines of source code, more than 90 test cases, more than > one year of work. Today, a new framework for web development was born. It's > name is Brook and its nice features ar