Re: [fpc-pascal] Arm EABI vs OABI [was:DateToStr in arm does not work!]

2007-07-08 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Marc Santhoff ha escrit: Can't you try to write a simple program using the functions in question and compile with "fpc -al"? the syscalls are in the rtl, so they won't show up in my program (not that I understand asm assambler, but according to http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2005-

Re: [fpc-pascal] Arm EABI vs OABI [was:DateToStr in arm does not work!]

2007-07-08 Thread Marc Santhoff
Am Sonntag, den 08.07.2007, 19:31 +0200 schrieb Luca Olivetti: > En/na Jonas Maebe ha escrit: > > > > On 08 Jul 2007, at 18:06, Luca Olivetti wrote: > > > >>> I don't think anyone has ever tried to use the libc-based rtl with > >>> linux/arm. > >> > >> And without using libc, what kind of syscal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Arm EABI vs OABI [was:DateToStr in arm does not work!]

2007-07-08 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Jonas Maebe ha escrit: On 08 Jul 2007, at 18:06, Luca Olivetti wrote: I don't think anyone has ever tried to use the libc-based rtl with linux/arm. And without using libc, what kind of syscalls do fpc generate OABI or EABI? (or, again, is there no difference between the two?) I have

Re: [fpc-pascal] Arm EABI vs OABI [was:DateToStr in arm does not work!]

2007-07-08 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 08 Jul 2007, at 18:06, Luca Olivetti wrote: I don't think anyone has ever tried to use the libc-based rtl with linux/arm. And without using libc, what kind of syscalls do fpc generate OABI or EABI? (or, again, is there no difference between the two?) I have no idea. You could try comp

Re: [fpc-pascal] Arm EABI vs OABI [was:DateToStr in arm does not work!]

2007-07-08 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Jonas Maebe ha escrit: On 06 Jul 2007, at 12:37, Luca Olivetti wrote: FPC can do both, but syscalls are default because these binaries are more portable across distributions (and versions) than glibc and thus easier to deploy. (and recently, libc has been broken after the introduction o

Re: [fpc-pascal] Arm EABI vs OABI [was:DateToStr in arm does not work!]

2007-07-08 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 06 Jul 2007, at 12:37, Luca Olivetti wrote: FPC can do both, but syscalls are default because these binaries are more portable across distributions (and versions) than glibc and thus easier to deploy. (and recently, libc has been broken after the introduction of the new syscalls. There

Re: [fpc-pascal] Arm EABI vs OABI [was:DateToStr in arm does not work!]

2007-07-06 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Marco van de Voort ha escrit: En/na Bernd Mueller ha escrit: I guess that fpc does not care about OABI/EABI. The compiler ether generates fpu opcodes or not (when floating point is used). This depends on the -CfSOFT option while building the compiler/rtl. Yes, but I think that fpc genera

Re: [fpc-pascal] Arm EABI vs OABI [was:DateToStr in arm does not work!]

2007-07-05 Thread Marco van de Voort
> En/na Bernd Mueller ha escrit: > > > I guess that fpc does not care about OABI/EABI. The compiler ether > > generates fpu opcodes or not (when floating point is used). This depends > > on the -CfSOFT option while building the compiler/rtl. > > Yes, but I think that fpc generates its own sysca

Re: [fpc-pascal] Arm EABI vs OABI [was:DateToStr in arm does not work!]

2007-07-05 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Bernd Mueller ha escrit: I guess that fpc does not care about OABI/EABI. The compiler ether generates fpu opcodes or not (when floating point is used). This depends on the -CfSOFT option while building the compiler/rtl. Yes, but I think that fpc generates its own syscalls (not going thr

Re: [fpc-pascal] Arm EABI vs OABI [was:DateToStr in arm does not work!]

2007-07-05 Thread Bernd Mueller
Luca Olivetti wrote: En/na Henry Vermaak ha escrit: i urge you to read this: http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort http://www.codesourcery.com/gnu_toolchains/arm/faq.html i haven't completely read it (hence i can't answer your questions that well, sorry). I'm wondering if my strange problems a

[fpc-pascal] Arm EABI vs OABI [was:DateToStr in arm does not work!]

2007-07-04 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Henry Vermaak ha escrit: i urge you to read this: http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort http://www.codesourcery.com/gnu_toolchains/arm/faq.html i haven't completely read it (hence i can't answer your questions that well, sorry). I'm wondering if my strange problems are due to a badly buil