On 2022-09-07 17:09, Benito van der Zander via fpc-pascal wrote:
Hi,
https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source/-/issues/38703
I'm afraid that with -O4 it is by design.
-O4 enables -OoUNCERTAIN, and the documentation about -OoUNCERTAIN
notes that:
"If uncertain optimizations are enable
Hi,
https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source/-/issues/38703
I'm afraid that with -O4 it is by design.
-O4 enables -OoUNCERTAIN, and the documentation about -OoUNCERTAIN
notes that:
“If uncertain optimizations are enabled, the CSE algorithm assumes that
— If something is written to a lo
Peter B via fpc-pascal schrieb am Mi., 7.
Sep. 2022, 13:58:
> I'm wondering if this is related to
> https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source/-/issues/38703
>
> That caused a parameter corruption in a standard function.
> https://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/2022-March/060361.html
I'm wondering if this is related to
https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/fpc/source/-/issues/38703
That caused a parameter corruption in a standard function.
https://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/2022-March/060361.html
Should be easy to check. Just try compiling with -O1
Cheers,
Peter
Am 04.09.2022 um 22:05 schrieb Hairy Pixels:
On Sep 4, 2022, at 1:36 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Does this also happen if you don't use a class? Otherwise it might be related
with the other error you already reported. But report this anyway, I'll simply
mark it as duplicate if necessary...
I on
> On Sep 4, 2022, at 1:36 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> Does this also happen if you don't use a class? Otherwise it might be related
> with the other error you already reported. But report this anyway, I'll
> simply mark it as duplicate if necessary...
>
I only reproduced using a class with g
Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal schrieb am
So., 4. Sep. 2022, 18:07:
> The following program uses an anonymous nested function which captures a
> local variable. It seems the arguments get corrupted (likely because of the
> hidden first param for the nested function signature) and prints garbled
> da
The following program uses an anonymous nested function which captures a local
variable. It seems the arguments get corrupted (likely because of the hidden
first param for the nested function signature) and prints garbled data. I
reduced this snippet down from another project but I’m not sure if
