On 2025-02-24 12:44, Michalis Kamburelis via fpc-pascal wrote:
Karoly Balogh wrote:
.
.
3. Discussions whether language X is good or bad should be an
independent discussion, in an independent thread(s), IMHO. Because
.
.
...and a different mailing list (in particular, fpc-other).
Tomas
On 2025-02-24 11:22, Arne Hanssen via fpc-pascal wrote:
Den 24.02.2025 09:27, skreiv Karoly Balogh via fpc-pascal:
On Sat, 22 Feb 2025, DougC via fpc-pascal wrote:
Hi,
[...]
As a former OS/2 user I find REXX (Regina Rexx nowadays) very
versatile and useful - and easy to learn. But you're
On 2/21/25 12:04, Anthony Walter via fpc-pascal wrote:
[...]
Javascript:
let data = { name: "James", age: 25 };
function update(name) {
data.name = name;
}
function verify(note) {
console.log("received note " + note);
console.log("data name is " + data.name);
hello(data, " messa
Karoly Balogh wrote:
> We're in the offtopic again, but I really hate this kind of elitism. As a
> kid I started with BASIC - on various Commodore home computers then also
> on early IBM PCs - and I hope to think I grew up to be a semi-decent
> programmer. At least I can fix your Pascal compiler fo
Den 24.02.2025 09:27, skreiv Karoly Balogh via fpc-pascal:
Hi,
On Sat, 22 Feb 2025, DougC via fpc-pascal wrote:
Why not? Because it helps a distinctly inferior language design to
perpetuate.
It used to be said that any programmer that first learned to program
using BASIC was ruined for life.
Hi,
On Sat, 22 Feb 2025, DougC via fpc-pascal wrote:
> Why not? Because it helps a distinctly inferior language design to
> perpetuate.
>
> It used to be said that any programmer that first learned to program
> using BASIC was ruined for life. I would say the same thing about
> Javascript.
We'r
I'm not a fan of javascript myself, but I see nothing wrong with having
it as an option. It's never bad to have another tool in the toolbox. I
can see situations where it would be useful. I'd not be likely to use
it, because javascript isn't my thing, but I certainly can easily point
to proj
Why not? Because it helps a distinctly inferior language design to perpetuate.
It used to be said that any programmer that first learned to program using
BASIC was ruined for life. I would say the same thing about Javascript.
Doug C.
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 17:46:49 -0500 wrote ---
I am also allergic to javascript!
Consider Lua instead.
Doug C.
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 07:35:39 -0500 Alexey T. via fpc-pascal
wrote ---
Scripting is good thing. But I hate JS. No mandatory quotes around dict
keys. Arrow functions which are sugar and not needed. etc etc.
I sugg
Scripting is good thing. But I hate JS. No mandatory quotes around dict
keys. Arrow functions which are sugar and not needed. etc etc.
I suggest to use Python.
Python-for-Lazarus is in the github.
I like Python!
Alexey
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pa
Greetings all,
I am working on a project that needs scripting and I've decided to make use
of Fabrice Bellard's awesome QuickJS library. I am considering making it
nice to use for the rest of the Free Pascal user community by implementing
an interesting way of integrating Javascript that would mak
11 matches
Mail list logo
