Re: [fpc-pascal] About undocumented features

2009-06-10 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, fpcl...@silvermono.co.za said: > > I would think that some of the above feature had to be introduced into .Net > because a (close to) pure OO impementation does not support global vars, > global functions etc. as a hybrid language like Object Pascal does. Java and C#/CL

Re: [fpc-pascal] About undocumented features

2009-06-10 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 10 Jun 2009, at 10:45, fpcl...@silvermono.co.za wrote: What other "jewels" are hidden from "view"? Is there some documentation documenting undocummented features that one can read? That's sort of a contradictio in terminis :) I'm not aware of a list of "still to be documented features"

Re: [fpc-pascal] About undocumented features

2009-06-10 Thread fpclist
Hi guys, > "strict" is introduced for new delphi compatibility? A most welcome addition. I'm ashamed to admit that I only found out that it's been included in FPC today. I ran an old VM which has FPC ver 2.2.2 installed, and "strict" is supported! I'm currenly using FPC 2.2.5 What other "jewe

Re: [fpc-pascal] About undocumented features

2009-06-09 Thread dmitry boyarintsev
> I just read the recent documentation and found some undocumented features, > such as slice, strict, and dispinterface. Can anyone explain what they are? > And are there any more than these 3? AFAIK, "slice" is delphi comatibility function. Here's the description: http://delphi.about.com/library/

[fpc-pascal] About undocumented features

2009-06-09 Thread leledumbo
I just read the recent documentation and found some undocumented features, such as slice, strict, and dispinterface. Can anyone explain what they are? And are there any more than these 3? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/About-undocumented-features-tp23955603p23955603.html