On 02.09.2012 11:46, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
Hi, FPC and Lazaurs team
I noticed there is new component (PascalScript) ported to
lazarus/components/ and in the past AggPas also ported,
The idea, why you put many components not used for most users, same ask
in FPC
My example to understand me
I use S
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Martin wrote:
> The reason Pascalsript went into the main SVN is, that (if all goes well)
> then it will be used by the IDE itself. So the IDE will need it to be build.
That is good news for me :)
I also mentioned AggPas, if it have the same reason i think we ne
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> If somebody is interested to do so, he can do this. What does prevents
> someone technically (!) from releasing SQLit unit update installers from
> the currently used repository?
>
Partial agree, but
In another repo, you can have separated
On 02/09/2012 11:46, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
Hi, FPC and Lazaurs team
I noticed there is new component (PascalScript) ported to
lazarus/components/ and in the past AggPas also ported,
...
I use SQLite, we found a bug and this bug fixed by FPC team, now we
must wait long time to have new release
Am 02.09.2012 11:46, schrieb Zaher Dirkey:
> Hi, FPC and Lazaurs team
>
> I noticed there is new component (PascalScript) ported to
> lazarus/components/ and in the past AggPas also ported,
> The idea, why you put many components not used for most users, same ask
> in FPC
>
> My example to under
Hi, FPC and Lazaurs team
I noticed there is new component (PascalScript) ported to
lazarus/components/ and in the past AggPas also ported,
The idea, why you put many components not used for most users, same ask in
FPC
My example to understand me
I use SQLite, we found a bug and this bug fixed by
