In our previous episode, Paulo Costa said:
> >> I replaced size_t by PtrUInt, is there a better alternative?
> >
> > On *nix size_t is afaik declared in unit baseunix?
> >
>
> Right now I'm working in Linux but I latter would like to make it work
> in Windows. The main concern was if it was 32/64
On 24/04/2011 16:41, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Paulo Costa said:
I've come across some constructs that I'm not sure how to translate:
A procedure where one of the arguments is declared as:
size_t arg;
also a macro where appears:
sizeof(size_t)
I replaced size_t by Ptr
In our previous episode, Paulo Costa said:
> I've come across some constructs that I'm not sure how to translate:
>
> A procedure where one of the arguments is declared as:
> size_t arg;
>
> also a macro where appears:
> sizeof(size_t)
>
> I replaced size_t by PtrUInt, is there a better alternat
I've come across some constructs that I'm not sure how to translate:
A procedure where one of the arguments is declared as:
size_t arg;
also a macro where appears:
sizeof(size_t)
I replaced size_t by PtrUInt, is there a better alternative?
Paulo Costa
