Re: [fpc-pascal] 2.0.0 versus 2.0.2 - FreeBSD

2005-12-18 Thread Marc Santhoff
Am Samstag, den 17.12.2005, 18:23 +0200 schrieb Ziegenhorn Tourism Database: > Some weeks ago I switched from 1.0.x to 2.0.0. > > Well, a lot of work to eleminate "oldlinux", but it > works fine. I updated to 2.0.2 and something happend: > > I have some cgi-programs for a virtual FreeBSD 4.7 Serv

Re: [fpc-pascal] 2.0.0 versus 2.0.2 - FreeBSD

2005-12-18 Thread Marco van de Voort
> Well, a lot of work to eleminate "oldlinux", but it > works fine. I updated to 2.0.2 and something happend: > > I have some cgi-programs for a virtual FreeBSD 4.7 Server. > I compile under Linux (SuSE 8.2), tranfer the executable > to FreeBSD and do a "brandelf -t Linux prog-name" > > This work

Re: [fpc-pascal] 2.0.0 versus 2.0.2 - FreeBSD

2005-12-17 Thread Vincent Snijders
Ziegenhorn Tourism Database wrote: The download of older versions of fpc seems not possible. :-( So I burn everything on a CD-ROM. ;-) You can download 1.0.10 from ftp://ftp.de.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/olddist/1.0.10/ and 2.0.0 from ftp://ftp.de.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/dist/i386-freebsd-2.0.

[fpc-pascal] 2.0.0 versus 2.0.2 - FreeBSD

2005-12-17 Thread Ziegenhorn Tourism Database
Some weeks ago I switched from 1.0.x to 2.0.0. Well, a lot of work to eleminate "oldlinux", but it works fine. I updated to 2.0.2 and something happend: I have some cgi-programs for a virtual FreeBSD 4.7 Server. I compile under Linux (SuSE 8.2), tranfer the executable to FreeBSD and do a "brande