Am 31.03.2016 17:28 schrieb "Graeme Geldenhuys" <
mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk>:
>
> On 2016-03-31 16:06, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> > I am guessing it comes from C++/Java/C#, which AFAIK do not have
> > the 'initialization' section. But that's just a guess.
>
> [my personal opinion - feel fre
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016, Maciej Izak wrote:
2016-03-31 17:06 GMT+02:00 Michael Van Canneyt :
I imagine so, yes.
It is one of the reasons why I don't really see the usefulness of this
construct, except that it looks OOP-ish.
It is mostly for initialization "class var" related stuff inside rec
On 2016-03-31 16:46, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
> One could use an alternative approach and have "binding" units.
> The unit would consist of initialization section only, that does the
> necessary binding code.
tiOPF's TestSuite project has a tiTestDependencies.pas unit which
primarily consists of
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016, Dmitry Boyarintsev wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys <
mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk> wrote:
On 2016-03-31 16:06, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I usually have a 'Start Application' kind of routine where I register all
the necessary things, link thi
2016-03-31 17:06 GMT+02:00 Michael Van Canneyt :
> I imagine so, yes.
>
> It is one of the reasons why I don't really see the usefulness of this
> construct, except that it looks OOP-ish.
>
>
It is mostly for initialization "class var" related stuff inside records
and classes. Very usefully especi
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys <
mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk> wrote:
> On 2016-03-31 16:06, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > I usually have a 'Start Application' kind of routine where I register all
> > the necessary things, link things together (needed if you follow 'loosely
I meant Delphi optimization but I'm mistaking since they have it documented.
B.
__
Od: silvioprog
Komu: "FPC-Pascal users discussions"
Datum: 31.03.2016 16:17
Předmět: Re: [fpc-pascal] Class constructor called uncon
On 2016-03-31 16:06, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> I am guessing it comes from C++/Java/C#, which AFAIK do not have
> the 'initialization' section. But that's just a guess.
[my personal opinion - feel free to ignore this paragraph]
I hate such "features" pulled in from other languages, when Objec
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016, silvioprog wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Michael Van Canneyt <
mich...@freepascal.org> wrote:
[...]
I suspect the problem is not in the mode, but in detecting whether a class
is used
or not in a program. It becomes very complicated when you use e.g.
run-time p
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Michael Van Canneyt <
mich...@freepascal.org> wrote:
[...]
> I suspect the problem is not in the mode, but in detecting whether a class
> is used
> or not in a program. It becomes very complicated when you use e.g.
> run-time packages.
>
Hm... so FPC class constr
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016, silvioprog wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Vojtěch Čihák
wrote:
IMO compilers should be dogmatic otherwise one cannot rely on them. This
looks to me like advocating wrong optimization.
Blaazen
Thanks for reply Vojtěch, but are you referring to Delphi or F
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Vojtěch Čihák
wrote:
> IMO compilers should be dogmatic otherwise one cannot rely on them. This
> looks to me like advocating wrong optimization.
>
>
>
> Blaazen
>
Thanks for reply Vojtěch, but are you referring to Delphi or FPC
optimization?
I think that FPC s
fpc-pascal] Class constructor called unconditionally
As long as you don't use the class anywhere outside the class itself, the compiler takes this as the class not used at all and hence won't call the class constructor. So I guess you have to use the intialization section instead of tweak
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Sven Barth
wrote:
> Am 31.03.2016 15:33 schrieb "silvioprog" :
> > After read this explanations, is there some compiler option to make FPC
> with this same Delphi behaviour? I'm using MODE DELPHI.
>
> No, there is not. Currently class constructors (and destructor
Am 31.03.2016 15:33 schrieb "silvioprog" :
> After read this explanations, is there some compiler option to make FPC
with this same Delphi behaviour? I'm using MODE DELPHI.
No, there is not. Currently class constructors (and destructors) are called
always.
Regards,
Sven
__
Hello,
First, take a look at this small project:
=== code ===
program Project1;
{$IFDEF FPC}
{$MODE DELPHI}
{$ENDIF}
{$IFDEF MSWINDOWS}
{$APPTYPE CONSOLE}
{$ENDIF}
type
TFoo = class
public
class constructor Create;
end;
class constructor TFoo.Create;
begin
Writeln('TFoo.
16 matches
Mail list logo
