Re: [fpc-pascal] android basic question

2010-06-06 Thread Thierry Bothorel
Jonas Maebe a écrit : > That package only works under Linux/i386, because it is only intended as a > replacement for the Kylix libc unit. It cannot and will never work on any > other platform. It is also not compiled by the Makefile for Linux/ARM. So it > is normal that if you circumvent the mak

Re: [fpc-pascal] android basic question

2010-06-06 Thread Thierry Bothorel
Marco van de Voort a écrit : > In our previous episode, Thierry Bothorel said: > >> After googling I did not found clear answers, but my understanding is >> that it is not possible to build natives libraries for Android without >> writing a completely new lib

[fpc-pascal] android basic question

2010-06-06 Thread Thierry Bothorel
entation (bionic). After googling I did not found clear answers, but my understanding is that it is not possible to build natives libraries for Android without writing a completely new libc translation for bionic ? Thierry Bothorel ___ fpc-pasca

[fpc-pascal] buildfaq.pdf - about different starting compiler and generated compiler

2010-05-23 Thread Thierry Bothorel
Hi, I wonder if this sentence from the buildfaq is always relevantt : > A standard confusing detail when installing a snapshot is that the > target directory (e.g. /usr/local/lib/fpc/2.4.0) depends > on the version number. If you would follow the above sequence, and the > generated compiler (say

[fpc-pascal] benefit of "cross" string added to compiler name?

2010-05-22 Thread Thierry Bothorel
Hi, I am not comfortable with make and I was looking for why i get for example "ppcrossarm" if I cross build with a "one line" like make clean all install CROSSINSTALL=1 ... and only "pparm" with make clean all ... make install CROSSINSTALL=1 ... Reading makefile I understood why,