On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 10:35 +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 29 May 2011, at 09:33, herux wrote:
>
> > Do you think FreePascal can be used to compile applications for google
> > chrome browser, such as the following link?
>
> Probably not without changes to the code generator and RTL. Google native
So some things,
I'm working on a browser plugin
http://code.google.com/p/thefbi/
And I've made a Thefbi Target for Freepascal, The example
page shown in the screenshot
http://thefbi.googlecode.com/svn/wiki/images/Thefbishot7.png
Is actally written in Freepascal, So if people are interested in
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 13:32 +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 26 Aug 2009, at 13:21, Neil Graham wrote:
>
> > Is the absence of properties on Objects an omission by design or
> > simply
> > because no-one has gotten to it yet?
>
> They are supported in fpc and in obj
Is the absence of properties on Objects an omission by design or simply
because no-one has gotten to it yet?
Similarly case statements as they appear in records are not supported.
I would quite like to have the functionality to do some sort of union on
a data structure that also supported (non-vir
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 11:56 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> That project is such a mess (my personal opinion). Just the other day
> I wanted to download the Eclipse IDE, to see what has changed over the
> last few years since I looked at it. Well, after browsing their
> website for 30 minutes,
To add my two cents to this debate.
I have always thought the ideal form of standards (or de facto thereof) came
from benevolent dictators. Borland did that job well for quite a long time,
a single vision developed well beats the design-by-committee half-compromise
path any day.
The problem
Daniël Mantione wrote:
We've got a inline procdir? Or are you referring to macros?
inline has the potential to do the trick but it's harder than something
from a #include based
system because with an include system the compiler actually gets to see
the original code
and can do a lot more.
Since the advantages of pascal were being discussed I thought I'd
mention some of the
things that make me choose C over pascal for some things.
I don't actually think of these as 'pascal sucks because x'. It's more
of 'We need to add x'
It's more compiler than language based.
1. Inline func
Marc PERTRON wrote:
The rules :
-The program MUST : *Compile and work in fullscreen mode under Ubuntu
6.10 (i386), in at least 640x480, 800x600 and 1024x768 with Gnome or KDE
I'd recommend saying fullscreen in at least 640x480, 800x600 _OR_ 1024x768.
If you are using 3d style rendering then
Den Jean wrote:
The first alternative for the most wanted applications
is Pixel Image Editor, a FreePascal application.
'tis a shame that Pixel Image Editor is not Open Source.
I'd feel much more inclined to contribute to open source if projects
were in FreePascal.
__
10 matches
Mail list logo
