Re: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread Mark Andrews
They haven't raised any money yet. The money will only be collected if Borland were to accept an offer from these folks. The amount so far is more akin to pledges. Mark L505 wrote: Who gets the $22,000 they have raised so far, if their plan doesn't work out? ___

Re: [fpc-pascal] Object pascal a "Modern Language"

2006-03-03 Thread Mark Andrews
Tony Pelton wrote: it is *everything* that Java is, but better. i feel like the hobbyist programmer in me has been reborn AND ... i've actually started to look out into the job market a little, with an eye towards maybe trying to make a jump from being a Java J2EE web application developer to

Re: [fpc-pascal] Object pascal a "Modern Language"

2006-03-03 Thread Mark Andrews
Matt Henley wrote: understand. A modern language such as any of the .NET languages will meet the efficiency objective but portability remains an issue. While I believe the with .Net, you will have the same speed issues that you have with Python since it compiles to CLR and not native machine

Re: [fpc-pascal] for..in loops?

2005-11-20 Thread Mark Andrews
Marc Santhoff wrote: If you'd ask me: My wish would be to see fpc compiling programmes for the BlackFin-CPUs and for the ECOS2 operating system, can this be implemented, please? ;) Marc So the number of users of fpc is extended by two? three at most? :-) Mark _