You can find all fpc versions versions of the libgdb*.zips (they contain all
the .a files needed) on the freepascal ftp site /contribs/libgdb/... The ones
used for v2.0.4 were mostly v6.2.1 & probably for linux eg for windows IIRC.
You have to unzip the appropriate libgdb into the appropriate di
Not in cutils.pas - found them in compiler/cclasses.pas. J
>
>
> At 16:00 27-9-2006, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Is TFPHashTable the same as Delphi's THashedStringList?
> >
> >I am looking for a List class that can hold large amounts of objects
> >with a ID string associated for quick lookups.
>
Does this mean we can't do snapshot on win32? Is there a fix planned? Eg
couldn't we write a fpc version of cp - guess this would only be a few lines or
is it more complicated than this?
Regards John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter
V
The daily v211 & v20 win32 snapshots are currently working ok - they are done
on winme which doesn't have this problem, so you could download the snapshot
from ftp.freepascal.org .../snapshots/ if that's what you want.
Regards John
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailt
This is a known error - I get it too - but I only get when using the v2.1.1
compiler to start make. Do you get it when starting with the v2.0.2 release
compiler released too? What about trying a snapshot of v20 compiler eg
base_go32_v20.zip or similar.
You can get more info with "opt=-va" on CL
Suggest you read these links - but from memory this is what you do. As was said
before the utils are not included in snapshots- usually it's just the minimum
there.
A) you need to download the latest go32v2 release which is 2.0.2 eg from
ftpmaster.freepascal.org or another ftp site, from
/pub
Felipe, I use Win ME to make go32v2, v2.0.3 and v2.1.1 so this should work ok.
I've also used win9se in the past.
I produce daily snapshots of these. See ftp.freepascal.org\ snapshots\v20 &
v21, so you can download these & try them out.
Regards John
> -Original Message-
> From: [
s
>
>
>
> On 7 okt 2005, at 14:58, Lee, John wrote:
>
> > FYI the latest Win32 v2.1.1 snapshot on ftp freepascal.org
> was last
> > night & contains all source changes up to then. John
>
> That does not help for people using
FYI the latest Win32 v2.1.1 snapshot on ftp freepascal.org was last night &
contains all source changes up to then. John
>
> If you downloaded a snapshot, the reason is probably that it was
> added after that snapshot was created.
>
>
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by
As Vinzent says there are some problems with the dos (go32v2) - not sure that
these are bad enough to prevent us doing a v2.0.x release shortly - the
compiler & rtl seem to be fine. Anyway in the meantime the _daily_ dos v2.0.1
snapshot which has release + fixes functionality and the v2.1.1 snap
make cycle and make zipinstall both work fine here (today) on win32 v2.1.1 and
v2.0.1 using fpc.zip in ftp... snapshot/source . If you want the runnable
binaries the daily snapshots are now working again too...on
ftp.../snapshot/v21/ or /v20 in fpc-*.zip (whole thing including ide),
base*.zip (
There is a v2.0.0 version of go32v2 and will, I hope, be v2.x versions too.
When things have settled after the v2.0 release, I'll be making these available
as daily snapshots on ftp.freepascal.org in .../snapshots. The v2.0 compiler
has the same functionality as the rest of fpc v2.0 & works ok,
You are right- in general the win32 version runs more slowly on win9x than
the dos version. Dependent on the type of benchmarks the difference is up to
30%. Strangely this happens even for fp benchmarks eg fft or non fp
processor intensive code and which probably don't use memory management. We
don
You may have looked at this already, but can't you run win 9x of some sort
eg 98. This can be quite cheap 10e or thereabouts...My guess is this'll run
on a 486/pentium with 1? G disk, 16? M memory -then use dos (or even win32)
fpc...This'll give you 'multitasking' of a sort and be easier to suppor
I´m on holiday at present - back 28th so I´ll get snapshots for go32 &
win32 going again then. Regards John
-Original Message-
From: Cristiano Magro
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23/06/2004 14:57
Subject: Re[4]: [fpc-pascal]there is a problem in fpc daily binary
snapshot
Ciao Peter,
Wedne
Not sure about your other problems but the comparison problem between
ppc386.exe and ppc3 isn't the problem. I get this often when doing win32 or
go32v2 makes (I'm running win9x)... it's something to do with a few bytes of
uninitialised memory.
I've fixed it for automatic snapshot makes by replac
Marco, there isn't much documentation for xcomp around... suggest you put
the info in this email, and a link http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/buildfaq.pdf
or a copy of the document into ftp:\...contrib\cross\ eg in a readme?
Regards John
For more info about this kind of tricks see
You might want to put -gl in there too, so if there is run time error it
tells you where...J
> FPC doesn't even complain about range exceeded whether
> during compilation or runtime... isn't this an egregious
> violation of Pascal's strict typing philosophy? Does
> Turbo Pascal/Delphi behave this
Did you turn it on when you compiled... default is off. J
FPC doesn't even complain about range exceeded whether
during compilation or runtime... isn't this an egregious
violation of Pascal's strict typing philosophy? Does
Turbo Pascal/Delphi behave this way as well?
This e-mail and any atta
Raivo, you need to give a bit (or a lot!) more information re the version of
fpc, the unit(s), and include the part of your program that's showing the
fault if you want some suggestions...
Regards John
-Original Message-
From: Raivo Nael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 July 2003 10:57
You can get the whole of the current v10 or v11 source from
ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/snapshot/v11/source or /v10/source in fpc.zip, or
you can get packages.zip from these directories too...
The ftp site has been down for a few days but seems ok at the moment. hth
Regards John
-Original Me
Here is a 'better' random no. generator, converted for fpc, based on the
'mersenne twister'. We intend/hope to use in fpc at some point...look up the
references in the code for info about it, why it's better etc
Regards John
rtl/inc/system.inc, function random.
This e-mail and any attachme
Here's a program I wrote some time ago (it's been tested with with
win32,go32v2 & linux) to help you to analyse the map file - I didn't find it
easy! And a readme...
HTH
John
-Original Message-
From: Peter Vreman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 09:27
To: [EM
Win32 or dos (go32v2) fpc work perfectly well on
win98. I run them on win95 & win me. Suggest you use the latest release
v1.0.6, available from the many mirror sites. The
complete downloads for win32 and dos are about 15-20 Mbytes in
size. If you only want to compile, link & run (ie you don
This
question isn't very easy to answer - there is no information in it. Please try
to be more precise!
We can
help you if you give us some information eg what operating system are you
using, what are you trying to do compile& run, or debug? What did you
download? What were the error me
Why don't we suggest to the author that he puts info into our contib units?
Or put info in there anyway? J
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 14:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]Do you know fpmath
> Ramom Flo
Hello everyone...Just a reminder that it's always good to hear from you
about faults in fpc because this helps to make it better, and you can report
these via the web site interface, or using these [fpc-pascal] & [fpc-devel]
mailing lists. We are approaching in the next few weeks/months a new
relea
This isn't enought info! A bit more info needed eg what version/flavour of
fpc, date, what source are you compiling...Regards John
-Original Message-
From: James Mills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 17:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [fpc-pascal]FPC Error!
ok, so for the appropriate o/s we
repeat
1 just scan the local disks for eg the ppc386.exes, fp.exes, ppc.cfgs,
base*,zips, ide*.zips or whatever are appropriate for the o/s & o/p to
screen what versions etc the user has on the system
2 then look in ppc.cfg & check whether the references there
If you keep it runnnable on windoze and go32v2, I'll help you to test it. I
can also contribute eg a (non OO) FP test unit? if you like. Any ideas about
how to define the 'features' to be tested? Regards John
-Original Message-
Hello, List!
> Do you want to write that? :)
If nobody els
2 choices, use profiling (see Marco's response), which is ok but a bit
cumbersome IMHO, or add your own timing (this is what I do). I use clock
from Tomas Schatzl's cpu unit which works for most o/s and also different
pascals eg vpasc, fpc etc (1 microsec accuracy) and put in timing statements
in t
So now you've had Marco's ideas + my 0.1 euro's worth (there are some
differences in our approaches + some common ideas) re what the problem is &
how you should test what's happening, please let us know what the results of
your experiments are...J
---
Now that the list seems to be working
Goes w/o saying that program perf depends on many things, but typically if
one runs a processor intensive (no i/o) benchmark eg an fft (fp) or a large
integer calculation on processors of different speeds the time is about
proportional to the proc speed and possibly the memory speed (a bit) if the
33 matches
Mail list logo
