On 07 May 2011, at 09:22, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> That's why that sort of stuff belongs on fpc-other rather than fpc-pascal.
> Everyone: please follow up there.
As you wish -
http://lists.freepascal.org/lists/fpc-other/2011-May/000597.html
___
fpc-pasc
--- Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isaac Gouy schrieb:
> > Suggestions please on what I've done wrong here
> >
> >
>
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64q/benchmark.php?test=mandelbrot&lang=fpascal&id=3#log
> >
> >
>
Suggestions please on what I've done wrong here
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64q/benchmark.php?test=mandelbrot&lang=fpascal&id=3#log
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64q/benchmark.php?test=meteor&lang=fpascal&id=1#log
___
fpc-pascal mai
--- Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isaac Gouy wrote:
> > We welcome more elegant and/or faster programs.
> >
> > To contribute please attach a complete source code file to a
> tracker
> > item following the FAQ instructions:
> >
>
We welcome more elegant and/or faster programs.
To contribute please attach a complete source code file to a tracker
item following the FAQ instructions:
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/faq.php#contributeprogram
best wishes, Isaac
--- L505 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some of the tests plac
All the Free Pascal programs on Intel P4 have been re-measured with
Free Pascal 2.0.2
Several older benchmarks have been deprecated and replaced.
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/pascal.php
best wishes, Isaac
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spa
