- Original Message -
From: "Harald Houppermans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 3:19 AM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]Apple Mac pointer problem
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Harald Houpperman
- Original Message -
From: "Harald Houppermans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 3:06 AM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]Apple Mac pointer problem
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Stephe
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Downs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 8:49 PM
Subject: [fpc-pascal]Apple Mac pointer problem
I am porting a Mac CodeWarrior project to FreePascal and have hit a
compile problem with a pointer. In my or
I quote from someone else:
"standard IEEE floating values, are highly inaccurate for scientific
calculations."
I you sure you want to use floating point math for your library ? :)
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.or
> > What pascal compiler is used to compile free pascal ? :)
>
> FPC. Early versions were compiled with TP.
That's the most funniest thing in software...
Using previous software/version to create new versions... then using those
again to make newer versions
and each new version has ofcourse new
- Original Message -
From: "Florian Klaempfl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]Math/Algebra Unit for FreePascal
> Harald Houppermans wrote:
> >>3) Everytime I have to boot on Wi
- Original Message -
From: "Agustin Barto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]Math/Algebra Unit for FreePascal
> 1) Using proprietary software to build scientific applications (like
> in my case) is just wrong. You
- Original Message -
From: "Agustin Barto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 9:28 PM
Subject: [fpc-pascal]Math/Algebra Unit for FreePascal
> I'm developing a statistical software and I need a mathematical
> (algebra) unit for FreePascal. Right now
Just a general comment:
Have you thought about writing a generic/general linked list unit first and
then using that to implement the widget stuff ?
Since writing linked lists can be tricky... best is to make a generic unit
for it... test it well... and use it ;)
I can think up some reasons why n
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Schatzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 12:47 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]high performance counter for dos/tp7
> Hello,
>
> >
> > But ehm... it seems your website is locked... unable to view/download
code
> > e
Well I just finished implementing my own high performance unit for timing
and timeouts etc... using bios tick count and pit tick count...
thx to some large document ;)
So I thought I'd now give your stuff a look/try :)
But ehm... it seems your website is locked... unable to view/download code
et
Hello,
I thought I give this newsgroup a try since you guys seem to know so much
about all this stuff :D.
Windows has a high performance counter api.
With this api one can read the tick frequency and the tick count.
Dividing the tick count by the tick frequency gives the time that has past
or a
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Maebe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]Modifying cpu registers while in turbo pascal
interrupt routine ?
>
> On 20 mrt 2004, at 03:21, Harald Houppe
- Original Message -
From: "Nikolai Zhubr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 10:59 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]Modifying cpu registers while in turbo pascal
interrupt routine ?
> Hi,
> Friday, 19 March, 2004, 14:10:02, Klaus Hartnegg wrote:
> [...]
- Original Message -
From: "Nikolay Nikolov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]wow quite cool example you made there :)
> Harald Houppermans wrote:
>
> >WOW very interesting
- Original Message -
From: "Nikolai Zhubr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 12:07 AM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]Modifying cpu registers while in turbo pascal
interrupt routine ?
> Hi,
> Thursday, 18 March, 2004, 18:26:
- Original Message -
From: "Nikolay Nikolov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]wow quite cool example you made there :)
> Harald Houppermans wrote:
>
> >WOW very interesting
- Original Message -
From: "Klaus Hartnegg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]Modifying cpu registers while in turbo pascal
interrupt routine ?
> > Turbo pascal 7 has the 'interrupt' directive which can be placed
> procedure Subst;
> begin
> writeln('Here we are!');
> repeat until false;
> end;
Lol now I understand why you placed repeat until false; lol
Without it it crashes :D hmmm
Probably no way to recover from it... hmmm
Or is there ?
Hmm maybe there is :)
Storing the CS and IP and then later
Wow
Did you just write this from scratch ?
That's a very cool trick you did there...
Replacing the CS ( code segment )
And IP ( instruction pointer )
Seems like a dirty little hack lol... like a hacker could use to execute
code hehehe.
Anyway I was also wondering how to proof it...
This
> Anybody else having that same experience ? shops having wirefull mouses
only
> ? yak.
Oh shit I ment wireless mouses only hehe.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
t junk quickly and turn back to
wirefull mouses :D
The salesman also said he was barely selling anything from that junk. :D
----- Original Message -
From: "Harald Houppermans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 2:59 AM
Subject:
It would be interesting to see how hard it would be to use free pascal and
16 bit packet drivers...
( Holyshit... my monitor just did weird... probably a power source... that
never happens wow, or maybe the monitor
is about to die hehehehe it's quite old :) 5 to 6 years or so... (Liyama
vision mas
Thanks for your quick reply but I already solved the problem :)
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Man... great... :)
It says so in the specification lol:
"
Resets the interface associated with handle to a known state,
aborting any transmits in process and reinitializing the -> receiver <-
"
Ofcourse I didn't know what that ment ? "reinitializing"
Could mean anything :)
Apperently it just d
Ok,
I think I have found the culprit...
The test program calls: 'reset interface' function.
This function is not working properly anyway... (it does not clear multicast
list and does not re-fetch address from rom)
Disabling this function from the test program makes it work and receive
packets :
Hmmm
Now I am not sure anymore... I re-enabled the set address and it still
works...
Maybe it is now working because I did a reboot :)
Maybe the old dummy receiver or so fucked something up I dont know.
Maybe constantly changing packet driver settings is not a good idea...
Maybe the packet dri
Nope...
It seems the problem was with setting the ethernet card address.
The test program was setting the ethernet address of the network card to
decimal:
10:20:30:40:50:60
Just to test it for fun...
Somehow that prevented the network card from receiving any packets.
Actually it is for a packet driver in dos.
Maybe I have to manually set the interrupt routine in the interrupt vector
table or will the packet driver do that ?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/f
Hi,
Maybe you guys know something about good old turbo pascal :D
Turbo pascal 7 has the 'interrupt' directive which can be placed behind a
procedure name to turn it into a interrupt handler.
procedure interrupt_handler(Flags, CS, IP, AX, BX, CX, DX, SI, DI, DS, ES,
BP: Word); interrupt;
begin
Wow it seems the socket unit documentation is way out of date.
I check the source...
sockets.pp uses winsock :D
sockets has a lot more functions :D
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
What my program would need is:
When a packet is received:
source address and source port
When sending a packet...
supplieing a
dest address and dest port.
The last could be done with connect.
How to do the first is now the question...
Maybe with recv... but the doc says it needs to be in a
Wow..
Sending udp packets works for linux too...
Exactly the same code :)
Just cross compiled lol.
:D
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
In windows that is...
Now trying for linux :D
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Well... whatta ya know... :)
sending udp packets actually works :D
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
This does seem to work but if it is usefull ?
MySocket := socket( AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, PF_UNSPEC );
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
MySocket := socket( AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, PF_INET );
This call fails with socket error 10043
I am guessing protocol not supported ?
Do I need to start winsock first or something...
I would like to work with the udp protocol.
___
fpc-pascal maillist
> I need a simple socket example in free pascal for windows and linux
> platform.
I found the documentation in the free pascal distribution...
I will now try to make my own example :D
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepas
I need a simple socket example in free pascal for windows and linux
platform.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
The free pascal 1.0.6 cross compiler host windows target linux is now
working.
I used cygwin, binutils-2.14 and free pascal.
( mingw unfortunately did not working: missing bison, flex, etc :) )
I tested a simple hello world program with knoppix ( linux running from
cd-rom ).
Then I also tested
Shit lol...
Wrong file name ( also hello world program had end. not end; ;) )
Now it says this: :)
C:\plztest2>fpc -TLINUX hellofp
Free Pascal Compiler version 1.0.6 [2002/04/23] for i386
Copyright (c) 1993-2002 by Florian Klaempfl
Target OS: Linux for i386
Compiling hellofp.pas
Assembling progr
Ok something strange is going on.
I copied as-new.exe and ld-new.exe to c:\pp\bin\linux
I also installed c:\pp\units\linux all kinds of linux units
I made a simple hello world program
begin
writeln( 'hello world' );
end;
Called hellofp.pas
Now I try to compile it:
It says this:
C:\plz
Hey wait a sec.
What s the difference between binutils AS.exe and NASM...
It seems NASM is for 8086x and AS is for all kind of processors, is that
correct ?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc
So I am not going to try mingw again at this point.
Already did that... it fails... no bison and flex.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
- Original Message -
From: "Nikolay Nikolov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 2:33 AM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]cross compiler potential ?
> Harald Houppermans wrote:
>
> >>then compile for linux with:
&
- Original Message -
From: "Nikolai Zhubr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 2:45 AM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]cross compiler potential ?
> Hi,
> Saturday, 28 June, 2003, 22:26:01, Harald Houppermans wrote:
> > S
Ok, which tarball contains the linux rtl source ?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
> then compile for linux with:
> fpc -TLINUX -Anasmelf filename.pas
Are these parameters based on the NASM idea ?
What are the right parameters based on the binutils ?
( Let s try binutils method first... before I get really confused :) )
Thx dude !
_
- Original Message -
From: "Nikolay Nikolov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 1:08 AM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]cross compiler potential ?
> Harald Houppermans wrote:
>
> > A step by step tutorial how to cre
Ok,
Finally after two days I have successfully compiled the binutils-2.14 using
cygwin, lol, without to much unix/linux knowledge on my side :)
Anyway... the problem was with make.. I had so many makes on my system
cygwin was using the wrong make tool, that has been solved by setting the
path in
Suppose I ever do get a free pascal compiler
working.
How usefull will it be ?
What I want to do is write windows server software
and then compile it for linux.
I would like to use: high performance counter,
tcp/ip stack, udp protocol.
That's about it.
A step by step tutorial how to
Hi,
I want to create a pascal compiler which can cross
compile for linux from windows.
( So I can develop server programs on windows and
then later run then on linux server's )
It seems there are 2 pascal compilers which might
be able to do that:
1. free pascal.
2. gnu pascal.
I am
52 matches
Mail list logo
