2007/10/11, Graeme Geldenhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 11/10/2007, Dean Zobec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > interface types. Could somebody please explain the difference. And
> > > why would I use one over the other?
> > Corba interfaces are not refer
2007/10/11, Graeme Geldenhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 11/10/2007, Dean Zobec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > interface types. Could somebody please explain the difference. And
> > > why would I use one over the other?
> > Corba interfaces are not refer
2007/10/11, Graeme Geldenhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I want to start learning the use of Interfaces. It's a language
> feature I have by-passing for some time now. From what I have read
> this seems to be a handy language feature to learn.
>
> In the FPC documentation in mentions I can have
2007/10/11, Cesar Romero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Graeme,
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> Hi
> > I want to start learning the use of Interfaces. It's a language
> > feature I have by-passing for some time now. From what I have read
> > this seems to be a handy language feature to learn.
> >
> > In the FPC document
Tom Verhoeff pravi:
> I know FreePascal includes the fpcunit unit testing framework
> (the compiler knows where to find it), but I can't seem to find any
> documentation via the regular www.freepascal.org, or the fpc wiki,
> or on the lazarus site?
>
> Michael's fpcunit.pdf seems hidden. Google t
Michael Van Canneyt pravi:
>
> The good news is that fpcunit is scheduled for documentation after fcl-base
> and before fcl-db. The bad news is that there are still 12 units to be
> documented in fcl-base. Which is about 1/3 of the total number of units
> in fcl-base.
>
> We'll get there. Slo
Graeme Geldenhuys pravi:
> Looking into the DUnit code I found the reason for passing in the
> name. It's actually a Suite Path used to automatically create
> TTestSuites for you so you can better group you tests case in a
> hierarchy. You would use it if you don't want the registered test
> case
Graeme,
> Hi,
>
> When would you use TestSuiteName and when TestName?
TestSuiteName is the name of the TestSuite (parent) that contains the Test
>
> For example, the following I think is wrong.
>
> constructor TTestSuite.Create(AName: string);
> begin
> Create();
> FName := AName;
> end;
>
>
Jose Pascual pravi:
> Hi everyone,
>
> How is it possible to reduce the size for binary generated by ppc?
>
http://wiki.freepascal.org/Size_Matters
Ciao,
Dean
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mai
Michael Van Canneyt pravi:
>
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Bisma Jayadi wrote:
>
>>> Run your application under 'strace' and send me the output, please.
>>> (Zip, please, because it can be rather big)
>> Done. Please check your email. I've made the program to the most simplest
>> shape just to produce t
Graeme,
Ok, I'll bite.. ;-)
I spoke to Dean the other day and he mentioned a new update for
FPCUnit will be sumbitted shortly. I didn't want to start on the new
XSLT stylesheet before I know what format the XML is in.
Dean, if you can confirm that the new xml format with nested test
suits are
rectory, the pdf is produced using pdflatex
from the latex output).
Note that we moved the essential fpcunit units to fcl/inc, the reports
and other utils remain in the fpcunit directory.
Ciao, Dean
Regards,
- Graeme -
On 2/3/07, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>> Try this.
>> http://bdn.borland.com/article/22576
NewInstance/FreeInstance is what I would have recommended as well.
> Maybe we should include an implementation in FPC by default ?
How ? The article works as-is AFAIK.
Btw, I think singletons are nonsense too. Why is a global variable evil,
Graeme Geldenhuys ha scritto:
> Here is the backtrace. I removed all other Assert tests, so only the
> one that causes the problem is executed.
>
> What is strange though, is that I created a new test that only creates
> the object and then tests the ObjectState. It it works, but all the
> other
Graeme Geldenhuys ha scritto:
> Thanks to all that replied. The string that is going to be stored in
> the List (with associated object) is a GUID string, so is very random
> by nature. Would this have any negative affects in the hash table?
>
> I will try it out anyway, I can always swap the in
Graeme Geldenhuys ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Is TFPHashTable the same as Delphi's THashedStringList?
>
> I am looking for a List class that can hold large amounts of objects
> with a ID string associated for quick lookups.
>
> Regards,
> - Graeme -
Yes, similar to a THashedStringList, but with a sp
bajrang soni ha scritto:
> Hello. I just downloaded you Free Pascal software. I haven't programmed in
> PASCAL for about 12 years. I am looking for a book or e-book that will
> teach
> me how to use the NEW pascal. What is the best reference material that you
> can think of, consider me a beginner
Graeme Geldenhuys ha scritto:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> Is is easy to add the list of executed tests (5 min job), but the
> missing feature I believe you are looking for is the timing results.
> Currently none of the fpcunit results contain timing values. This is
> something I wanted to add long ago. Th
Vincent Snijders pravi:
> Hi,
>
> Suppose I have a component TMyDataProcessor with the following declaration:
>
> type
> TMyDataProcessor = class
> function process(const s: string) : string;
> end;
>
> Now I want to test it with different strings, but instead of hard coding
> them I pu
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>
> I think the problem is the SlideTypeDB which is a property! I will
> change it to a standard function returning a string and try
> @si.SlideTypeDB again.
I guess it won't work, since assertException expects a procedure
(TRunMethod = procedure of Object).
I would crea
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to test the code below using the AssertException()
> call? I am sure it must be, I am just not sure how to use it.
>
> This is the work-around I have now, untill I can figure out how to use
> AssertException() correctly.
> ---
Jilani Khaldi wrote:
>
>> Learn to code with UnitTests (process is called Test Driven
>> Development).
>
> Never used. How does this work? I found only a unit called
> "UnitTests.pp" and nothing else.
> Thank you.
The first article that started the practice, written by Kent Beck and
Erich Gamm
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Lukas Gebauer wrote:
Look to next Pascal language enhancements
in Delphi-2006... (like operator overloads or class variables...)
we already have them in free pascal for a couple of years iirc and I've
never used them.
That's because they are quite l
Lukas Gebauer wrote:
foreach ... in ... do adds no additional abstraction layer. I consider
foreach usefull if it allows to create own iterators which are as fast as
walking a linked list with p:=p^.next; Especially since it then allows
e.g. to write iterators with data prefetching.
Just
Agustin Barto wrote:
What bad designs does it impose the programmer?? I have a big interest
to know because I like to make a as reusable as possible code. Are you
talking about the form designer??
Software that's designed starting from the user interface to the
behavioral parts of the pro
Alan Mead ha scritto:
Hello,
The Editor of Toolbox Magazine has allowed me to put an article
about FPCUnit online.
[...]
I found the article and the discussion on this list very helpful.
Thanks for writing it and making it available.
These are probably stupid questions, but all the ex
L505 ha scritto:
Since I don't exactly know what test frameworks are, even after reading about
them for the
past few years, I'm going to ask some risky questions. This is not a flame
thrower attempt
at the test framework advocates, I'm just trying to understand what exactly
they do, from a
"n
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>Where can I find it?
>>
>>
>
>It's included with FPC by default. Sources are in fcl/fpcunit.
>Just include fpcunit in your source. See the examples for a console demo.
>
>Lazarus has a special package that allows you to create either a GUI or
>a console test applic
5 of moneyleak.pp
What am I doing wrong?
Thank you in advance for any help,
Regards,
Dean Zobec
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Alle 16:03, domenica 24 ottobre 2004, Peter Vreman ha scritto:
> At 17:55 22-10-2004, you wrote:
> >Using the recent cvs builds of the compiler I was unable to locate the
> >address
> >of the method name table. Here is a test that works with version 1.9.4 but
> >does not work in 1.9.5 anymore:
>
>
Using the recent cvs builds of the compiler I was unable to locate the address
of the method name table. Here is a test that works with version 1.9.4 but
does not work in 1.9.5 anymore:
program prova;
uses
classes;
type
{$M+}
TTestCaseTest = class(TObject)
published
procedure TestSe
I'm using some code in objpas to get the names and the addresses of published
methods. Lately, in the cvs build, I encountered some problems. See the
results of the MethodAddress function in the latest cvs build for example:
it cannot get the address of methods (it worked with previous version
s from Delphi and translated the
Junit core testing framework from Java in a day or too:
http://camelos.sourceforge.net/fpcUnit.html , so,
no doubt for me that FPC is mature for serious programming.
If you need help for your article or you need a review, just ask (
Matt Emson wrote:
Exactly, which is why I prefer the idea Borland has gone for. The STL is not
a good idea.
Delphi doesn't have a decent containers library. TObjectList is derived
from TList instead as being designed as a wrapper (if Borland had read
the Danny Thorpe's book they would not imp
I've talked with some friends of mine about the use of Interface base classes
without reference counting in Delphi
like this
type
TNoRefCount = class(TObject, IUnknown)
protected
function QueryInterface(const IID:TGUID; out Obj):HResult; stdcall;
function _AddRef: Integer; stdcall;
Alle 12:25, domenica 15 febbraio 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
> > > I fixed this. The problem was that the behaviour of Borland's TList
> > changed
> > > - it got (a lot!) slower. In older TList implementations TList.Clear
> > didn't
> I understand their reasons, but it's not so cool if yo
Michalis and Peter,
ok, now it works :-), thank you!
> You can view generated object file with nm or objdump commands - e.g. call
>nm cwrite.o
> and you will see that cwrite.o does not contain 'writestringinc'
Thank you for the complete explanation, I didn' know for this tools.
You know, I'm co
Hi,
i tried to link a c function but had some problems:
a simple example:
in file cwrite.c
#include
void writestringinc(void);
void writestringinc(void) {
puts("This string is written using c");
fflush( stdout );
}
compiled with c using
g++ -c cwrite.c
now, this is a test pr
> I am trying to port the DUnit test framework to fpc and lazarus, see for
> more info
> http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/index.php?wiki=DunitProject.
I'll take a look
> The testframework unit compiles
I was able to compile it too, but I have still a lot of work to make it work I
guess ;-)
> and
> The typecast is incorrect. It should be
>
> Result:=(AssignPipe(..)<>-1);
Thank you.
> I'll fix this later this morning, thanks for reporting.
It's a pleasure :-) Thank you for the fix.
>Delphi port of JUnit called DUnit, but I doubt it will work,
> it meddles too much with the internals of obje
> See also http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/buildfaq.pdf for some pointers about
> building the FPC cvs.
Thank you for the tutorial, it helped me a lot. It was exciting to see the
compiler building process on the screen :-) So now I have a 1.9.1 for i386
Linux!
I have encountered a problem when doin
> Hmm, here it returns
>
> -bash-2.05b$ ./bugtest
> TMyObject
> -bash-2.05b$
>
> with
>
> Free Pascal Compiler version 1.9.1
>
> Compiler Date : 2003/11/11
> Compiler Target: i386
>
> on FreeBSD
> So it could be it that is already fixed after 1.9.0
Great, :-)
One more question, where can I find th
42 matches
Mail list logo
