2009/9/11 Henry Vermaak :
> Yes, I'd like to suggest that we don't discuss it here. These
> discussions usually deliver a huge amount of unsubstantiated arguments
> from people that don't know a thing about cross platform development,
> and are just a massive waste of time (in my opinion, of cours
I'm taking an interesting conversation in this feed comments:
http://wings-of-wind.com/2009/09/11/kylix-2011/
but I dont know enough FPC to documents appropriately it's features
and products done with it.
Is there someone that can bring some interesting contribuites to discussion?
bye all,
Corrad
> I shaw in the FPC future plan for Version 2.4 has a item:
> --
> Support for DispInterface and dispid (OLE binding on Windows).
> --
> is this near to COM?
Yes it is.
But I'm waiting for most value comments of any FPC developers:
teorically if FPC supports i
2009/9/8 yu ping
>
> Has anyone tried to implement a COM server with FPC?(on windows)
> ___
I think that couldn't be possible: COM is a proprietary techonolgy of
Microsoft used in windows platform, with a crossplatform compiler like
FPC would be impossi
Graeme written:
>
> My problem is the RTL document. It is HUGE! Last time I checked, it was
> just under 1600 pages.
>
> * Has anybody else printed the RTL document? If so, how did you bind it?
> No printer here wants to bind such a huge book.
> - Graeme -
>
>
I suggest the FPC dev team to con
> > Yes I know I can rename them locally, but I also thing it makes sense to
> > give the documents better "default" names than ref, prog, user.
>
> If there is a more or less consensus about such things, I don't see why
> we couldn't rename them.
>
>
I agreed with Graeme.
FPC is very well document
