I think I'm going to have to agree with everyone else on this one. If I
read this, thinking it was pascal code, I wouldn't have the slightest idea
what these % and/or $ operators were doing. Operator overloading should
never be used to change the meaning of an operator. It's there so you can
mak
hat to C++ programs. Would that be
possible without having to put wrappers over wrappers, or am I pretty much
stuck maintaining the library in both C++ and Pascal if I want it in both?
Thanks,
Bob Shaffer II
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
in pascal and then link it to a C++ program,
it wouldn't be so bad. I would have to rewrite it all, yes - but I
wouldn't have to maintain two nearly identical libraries.
_____________
Bob Shaffer II - Owner, Develo
