Re: [fpc-pascal] Multiple enumerators per class

2023-05-12 Thread Thomas Kurz via fpc-pascal
It's part of generics.collections and located in fpc\3.2.2\source\packages\rtl-generics\src\* - Original Message - From: Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal To: FPC-Pascal users discussions Sent: Friday, May 12, 2023, 14:59:11 Subject: [fpc-pascal] Multiple enumerators per class > On May 12

Re: [fpc-pascal] Multiple enumerators per class

2023-05-12 Thread Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal
> On May 12, 2023, at 7:24 PM, Marco van de Voort via fpc-pascal > wrote: > > Op 12/05/2023 om 14:16 schreef Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal: >> Is it possible to have multiple enumerators on one class? > > Yes, see e.g. TDictionary that allows iterations over keys and values and > both. There

Re: [fpc-pascal] Multiple enumerators per class

2023-05-12 Thread Marco van de Voort via fpc-pascal
Op 12/05/2023 om 14:16 schreef Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal: Is it possible to have multiple enumerators on one class? Yes, see e.g. TDictionary that allows iterations over keys and values and both. There is only one default iterator, but you can have some property that has its own iterator.

[fpc-pascal] Multiple enumerators per class

2023-05-12 Thread Hairy Pixels via fpc-pascal
Is it possible to have multiple enumerators on one class? Regards, Ryan Joseph ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Record Constructors which differ in parameter lists

2023-05-12 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal
On Fri, 12 May 2023, Thomas Kurz via fpc-pascal wrote: I would expect the type helper to remain functional. The types are the same for all purposes except they have a different RTTI entry. But this behaviour seems inconsistent to me. For example: With "var x:double" I can use "x.IsNan". Wi

Re: [fpc-pascal] Record Constructors which differ in parameter lists

2023-05-12 Thread Thomas Kurz via fpc-pascal
> I would expect the type helper to remain functional. The types are the same > for all purposes except they have a different RTTI entry. But this behaviour seems inconsistent to me. For example: With "var x:double" I can use "x.IsNan". With TDateTime, which is defined as "type TDateTime = type