Thomas Kurz via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Fr., 24. Juni 2022, 15:33:
> Thank you very much, declaring the operator within the record does indeed
> solve the issue.
>
> Just to be sure in case I might need it some day: Does this mean, if I
> need e.g. a comparison operator for a specialized TPair, I w
Thank you very much, declaring the operator within the record does indeed solve
the issue.
Just to be sure in case I might need it some day: Does this mean, if I need
e.g. a comparison operator for a specialized TPair, I would declare a record
class helper and define the operator there?
On 2022-06-24 09:02, Wolfgang Hubert via fpc-pascal wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
thank you for your thoughts and suggestions on this topic.
Tomas Hajny wrote:
I may be wrong, but I believe that the original poster meant that he
was using a "regular" (32-bit) version of WinXP on x86 and wanted to
cro
Travis Siegel via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Do., 23. Juni 2022, 20:08:
> There actually is a 64-bit version of xp, but it's not compatible with
> very much. Apparently, it didn't have an emulator in it, so running
> 32-bit software wasn't something it did by default. I never did figure
> out if it
Thomas Kurz via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Do., 23. Juni 2022, 19:45:
> When compiling, I get this error:
>
> pathfinding.pas(17,17) Error: Operator is not overloaded: "TTileSegment" =
> "TTileSegment"
>
> Which I don't understand -- because the "=" operator is defined in
> tesstypes.pas.
>
> Am I doi
Hi all,
thank you for your thoughts and suggestions on this topic.
Tomas Hajny wrote:
I may be wrong, but I believe that the original poster meant that he was
using a "regular" (32-bit) version of WinXP on x86 and wanted to
cross-compile from there to aarch64-win64.
Yes, you are right. I have