I am trying to build a mipsel-embedded compiler.
It says here that this is possible
https://wiki.freepascal.org/TARGET_Embedded_Mipsel.
I followed the steps below
git clone https://github.com/fpc/FPCSource.git
cd ./FPCSource
make clean buildbase installbase INSTALL_PREFIX=$HOME/mips/fpc-mipsel
CROS
> On Nov 28, 2021, at 7:01 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> Anything that relates to picking functions *must* be part of the overload
> handling. You can easily see this with your named argument proposal when not
> all arguments are named (and then the compiler also needs to check that
> unnamed pa
Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am
So., 28. Nov. 2021, 03:12:
>
>
> > On Nov 27, 2021, at 5:00 PM, Sven Barth
> wrote:
> >
> > The compiler does not know which routine is called upon parsing the
> parameter declarations (which would mean that error reports would need to
> be deferred until th
Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am
So., 28. Nov. 2021, 05:32:
>
>
> > On Nov 27, 2021, at 5:03 PM, Sven Barth
> wrote:
> >
> > candidates:=tcallcandidates.create(sym:=symtableprocentry,
> st:=symtableproc,ppn:=left,
> ignorevisibility:=ignorevisibility,allowdefaultparas:=not(nf_isproperty in
> On Nov 28, 2021, at 4:18 PM, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> What do you mean? Is there already some call by arg names in some
> mode(switch)?
I mean all the plumbing is there so the feature could easily be extended from
IDispatch to work with normal function calls.
Regards,
On 28/11/2021 10:18, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-pascal wrote:
On 26.11.21 04:10, Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote:
[...]The majority of the infrastructure is already there so it needs
to merely be extended.
What do you mean? Is there already some call by arg names in some
mode(switch)?
No, it
On 26.11.21 04:10, Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote:
[...]The majority of the infrastructure is already there so it needs to merely
be extended.
What do you mean? Is there already some call by arg names in some
mode(switch)?
Mattias
___
fpc-pascal
