пн, 22 февр. 2021 г. в 16:11, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal <
fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org>:
>
> Arrays are simply no structured types,
>
Actually they are...
> thus them having "properties" is wrong as well. If users want expect
> arrays to be object oriented they should use corresponding langu
On 22/02/2021 1:10 pm, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
> If users
> want expect arrays to be object oriented they should use corresponding
> languages like Java or C#.
Fully agree. Even Java doesn't "objectify" arrays as some type of
object. Hence Java includes the Arrays class that has a static m
Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Mo., 22. Feb. 2021, 13:07:
>
>
> > On Feb 21, 2021, at 2:59 PM, Sven Barth
> wrote:
> >
> > You are supposed to use Length(X). There is no need for a "property".
> One doesn't need to objectify each and everything!
>
> Yes but programmers tend to be neurotic
Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Mo., 22. Feb. 2021, 10:07:
>
>
> > On Feb 19, 2021, at 8:50 AM, Ryan Joseph wrote:
> >
> > I just realized another potential problem. If we use the "default"
> keyword that means there could be multiple "defaults" unless we limit the
> property to 1 per clas
