James Richters schrieb am Mo.,
22. Feb. 2021, 01:07:
> I've been using a lot of dynamic arrays of records lately, Some are even
> Dynamic Arrays of records that contain other records, for example:
> Type
>XYZ_Record = Record
> X,Y,Z : Double
>End;
>
>Call_Stack_Record = Record
> On Feb 19, 2021, at 8:50 AM, Ryan Joseph wrote:
>
> I just realized another potential problem. If we use the "default" keyword
> that means there could be multiple "defaults" unless we limit the property to
> 1 per class, which would kind of defeat the purpose of the feature (like the
> is
> On Feb 21, 2021, at 2:59 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> You are supposed to use Length(X). There is no need for a "property". One
> doesn't need to objectify each and everything!
Yes but programmers tend to be neurotic and obsessive. :) I think many of us
would appreciate a matching "Count" met
I've been using a lot of dynamic arrays of records lately, Some are even
Dynamic Arrays of records that contain other records, for example:
Type
XYZ_Record = Record
X,Y,Z : Double
End;
Call_Stack_Record = Record
Location : LongInt;
Offset : XYZ_Record;
Rotation
Am 21.02.2021 um 15:59 schrieb Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal:
On Feb 20, 2021, at 7:52 PM, Виктор Матузенко via fpc-pascal
wrote:
And how do I write generic helper for all possible dynamic arrays?
By hand sadly. The RTL has added type helpers for many types but I don't think they added these f
> On Feb 20, 2021, at 7:52 PM, Виктор Матузенко via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> And how do I write generic helper for all possible dynamic arrays?
By hand sadly. The RTL has added type helpers for many types but I don't think
they added these for dynamic arrays. I agree that dynamic arrays shoul
