> On Feb 13, 2021, at 5:09 PM, Ben Grasset via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> This seems possibly a *little* too similar to the existing Interface type in
> Object Pascal, however, I *would* really like to see some kind of
> functionality that basically amounts to "has the same capabilities as
> I
> On Feb 13, 2021, at 12:38 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> Right now, Ryan, your suggestion looks like a solution in search of a
> problem, or a "hey, look at that feature in language X, I so must have that
> in Pascal as well". Those concepts more likely then not tend to end in
> problems or shou
This seems possibly a *little* too similar to the existing Interface type
in Object Pascal, however, I *would* really like to see some kind of
functionality that basically amounts to "has the same capabilities as
Interfaces and works on records and objects too, but does NOT require any
kind of heap
W dniu 2021-02-13 o 20:38, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal pisze:
Of course this does not provide any mechanism to directly add fields,
however the compiler could in theory optimize access through property
getters/setters if they're accessed through the surrounding class
instance instead of the inter
Am 10.02.2021 um 03:18 schrieb Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal:
We had talked about this some time ago and it's been rattling around in my brain so I wanted to
write it down into a formal proposal where we can discuss it and hopefully agree upon a syntax.
Everything is preliminary and tentative but
On 13/02/2021 16:52, Ched via fpc-pascal wrote:
Hello,
For one software I compile with fpc, Avast always complained. But only
when compiled for debugging.
That exe was sent to the false positive departement, and it toke about
_one mounth_ to have a corrected version of the AV. Afterwhat, he
n
Hello,
For one software I compile with fpc, Avast always complained. But only when
compiled for debugging.
That exe was sent to the false positive departement, and it toke about _one mounth_ to have a corrected
version of the AV. Afterwhat, he never complained even with reworked source code.
On 13/02/2021 03:55, Travis Siegel via fpc-pascal wrote:
that if you have any timing routines in your code, it tends to get
flagged by virus scanners. No clue why, but I've run afoul of that
issue more than once.
I read somewhere that some viruses have a build in wait, to evade
sandbox detec
Op 2021-02-12 om 22:48 schreef James Richters via fpc-pascal:
The problem I have had is when programs I compile generate a false virus
detection.. sure on my own computer I can just disable that directory from the
virus scanner but it becomes a problem when I release it to my customers and
th
> I've also noticed that if you have any timing routines in your code, it tends
> to get flagged by virus scanners. No clue why, but I've run afoul of that
> issue more than once.
>
Debugger detection?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.fre
10 matches
Mail list logo
