Re: [fpc-pascal] RTL semaphore supported?

Am 13.08.2020 um 06:36 schrieb Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal: Are semaphores actually supported in the RTL? I don't see they're available on macOS (compiling with trunk even). https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/3.0.0/rtl/system/semaphoreinit.html No, these functions where there only temporary.

[fpc-pascal] RTL semaphore supported?

Are semaphores actually supported in the RTL? I don't see they're available on macOS (compiling with trunk even). https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/3.0.0/rtl/system/semaphoreinit.html Regards, Ryan Joseph ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pas

[fpc-pascal] fpcres now supports compilation of RC files

Hello together! Thanks to the work of Martok the fpcres utility is now able to compile RC files into RES files. To compile an RC file to a RES file you need to pass the "-of res" argument as otherwise the RC reader won't be used (it's a "catch all" TResourceReader descendant and thus not reg

Re: [fpc-pascal] Resource compilation

Am 13.01.2019 um 18:38 schrieb Martok: Update time! [snip] All of windres's tests pass now, except for the Dialog related ones. I would consider it more or less finished. Any more things to do? Otherwise, I'll stack it into some

Re: [fpc-pascal] 3.2.0 Invalid PPU Version

On 2020-08-12 15:20, Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote: On Aug 12, 2020, at 5:39 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote: Yes. Please, provide the same output if you add "uses process;" to empty.pas. Also, please provide output of "ls -l /usr/local/lib/fpc/3.2.0/units/x86_64-darwin/fcl-process/process.ppu". H

Re: [fpc-pascal] 3.2.0 Invalid PPU Version

> On Aug 12, 2020, at 5:39 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote: > > Yes. Please, provide the same output if you add "uses process;" to empty.pas. > Also, please provide output of "ls -l > /usr/local/lib/fpc/3.2.0/units/x86_64-darwin/fcl-process/process.ppu". Here's that. Is it possible I overwrote the fil

Re: [fpc-pascal] 3.2.0 Invalid PPU Version

On 2020-08-12 12:30, Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote: On Aug 12, 2020, at 4:07 PM, Sven Barth wrote: Does the compiler report the correct version? Namely 3.2.0? What if you compile a simple program with no used units with -vu and check what the compiler prints for the PPU version of the Sys

Re: [fpc-pascal] 3.2.0 Invalid PPU Version

> On Aug 12, 2020, at 4:07 PM, Sven Barth wrote: > > Does the compiler report the correct version? Namely 3.2.0? What if you > compile a simple program with no used units with -vu and check what the > compiler prints for the PPU version of the System unit? > You mean like that? That empty

Re: [fpc-pascal] 3.2.0 Invalid PPU Version

Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am Mi., 12. Aug. 2020, 10:30: > Does anyone have any idea how this happened? I installed 3.2.0 from an > installer so why is the PPU version wrong? > > PPU Loading > /usr/local/lib/fpc/3.2.0/units/x86_64-darwin/fcl-process/process.ppu > PPU Invalid Version 208 >

[fpc-pascal] 3.2.0 Invalid PPU Version

Does anyone have any idea how this happened? I installed 3.2.0 from an installer so why is the PPU version wrong? PPU Loading /usr/local/lib/fpc/3.2.0/units/x86_64-darwin/fcl-process/process.ppu PPU Invalid Version 208 Regards, Ryan Joseph ___