Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Fr., 6. März 2020, 06:57:
> I'm continuing this from the bug tracker. Also please note that for some
> reason the mail list server has stopped sending me replies to gmail so I
> need to look at https://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/ for
> replies
Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal schrieb am
Fr., 6. März 2020, 06:57:
> I'm continuing this from the bug tracker. Also please note that for some
> reason the mail list server has stopped sending me replies to gmail so I
> need to look at https://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/ for
> replies
> On Mar 5, 2020, at 2:24 PM, Ryan Joseph wrote:
>
> Can we consider changing this behavior?
from https://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/2020-March/057434.html
On 05/03/2020 08:24, Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote:
>
Yes, it's a temporary variable but doesn't it make sense to giv
I'm continuing this from the bug tracker. Also please note that for some reason
the mail list server has stopped sending me replies to gmail so I need to look
at https://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-pascal/ for replies until this
get fixed. Maybe time to get rid of gmail? My private web ho
On 05/03/2020 08:24, Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote:
> Yes, it's a temporary variable but doesn't it make sense to give an error
> because the property is read only? It's basically a no-op like it is now and
> defeats the purpose of read-only properties. It also creates a nasty bug
> because t
