On Tue, 23 Apr 2019, Ryan Joseph wrote:
On Apr 23, 2019, at 5:32 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
That should be obvious:
Because a helper can only add methods to a type, not additional storage
space (memory). The basic type determines the memory layout of the data. A
helper cannot change
Seems like it's mixed up in some way with the FPC-style enumerator
operator, so the "class" version is recognized but not actually implemented
currently or something.
The normal way for classes/records/objects is to implement a GetEnumerator
function, anyways. Here's an expanded-on version of your
On 2019-04-24 02:36, Ryan Joseph wrote:
On Apr 23, 2019, at 8:28 PM, Alexander Grotewohl
wrote:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/Helper_types
under the checklistbox extender example.
I'd guess it's looking for THelper.GetX and THelper.SetX in your and
not finding them
Oh now I get it. Is thi
> On Apr 23, 2019, at 8:28 PM, Alexander Grotewohl wrote:
>
> http://wiki.freepascal.org/Helper_types
>
> under the checklistbox extender example.
>
> I'd guess it's looking for THelper.GetX and THelper.SetX in your and not
> finding them
>
Oh now I get it. Is this what I should be doing?
http://wiki.freepascal.org/Helper_typesunder the checklistbox extender example.I'd guess it's looking for THelper.GetX and THelper.SetX in your and not finding them--Alexander Grotewohlhttp://dcclost.com___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepa
> On Apr 23, 2019, at 6:25 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> A helper can not access its extended type in its interface, only in its
> implementation (and yes, this gets important if published properties are
> involved, which a helper may declare as well).
> Use a getter as a workar
Ryan Joseph schrieb am Di., 23. Apr. 2019,
21:54:
> So I remember now that any fields are not allowed in helpers. Can anyone
> explain why this must be the case or if it could be fixed?
>
A helper can not access its extended type in its interface, only in its
implementation (and yes, this gets i
> On Apr 23, 2019, at 5:32 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
> wrote:
>
> That should be obvious:
>
> Because a helper can only add methods to a type, not additional storage
> space (memory). The basic type determines the memory layout of the data. A
> helper cannot change that.
>
> Michael.
I mean
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019, Ryan Joseph wrote:
So I remember now that any fields are not allowed in helpers. Can anyone
explain why this must be the case or if it could be fixed?
That should be obvious:
Because a helper can only add methods to a type, not additional storage
space (memory). The ba
So I remember now that any fields are not allowed in helpers. Can anyone
explain why this must be the case or if it could be fixed?
> On Apr 20, 2019, at 11:24 AM, Ryan Joseph wrote:
>
> I feel like I may have asked this before but I can’t find anything on Google.
> Why doesn’t this work?
>
>
Is "class operator enumerator” supposed to work or is this a bug that it
compiles but doesn’t do anything? Seems like it should work.
===
{$mode objfpc}
{$modeswitch advancedrecords}
program test;
type
TArrayEnumerator = class
public type
TArrayValue = integ
Am 23.04.2019 um 12:04 schrieb James Richters:
I'm trying to figure out if there is some function available that would take a
string as input and return a double value that is the complete evaluation of
the string?
So when asked for a numeric input, the user could just put in a number like
6.
I'm trying to figure out if there is some function available that would take a
string as input and return a double value that is the complete evaluation of
the string?
So when asked for a numeric input, the user could just put in a number like
6.28 but also put in a formula like SQRT(2) or (3*(
13 matches
Mail list logo
