Il 14/08/2018 15:21, Marco Borsari via fpc-pascal ha scritto:
Why the code below does exit gracefully without prints anything?
Sure, it is for my poor knowledge of the assembler, but in some
details, please...
program branch;
{$ASMMODE intel}
label next,stop,a,b,c;
var idx:byte;
begin
write('
Am 16.08.2018 um 12:23 schrieb Dennis Poon:
Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
Am 15.08.2018 um 10:59 schrieb Dennis:
Why class operator is accepted for advanced records but not old
fashion object???
Because objects are not records. Internally they are handled more
closely to classes than reco
Am 16.08.2018 um 12:47 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
Am 15.08.2018 um 17:29 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
But maybe you are using mode delphi ? If so, try separating out the
object
definition in a separate unit which is not compiled in delph
> Am 15.08.2018 um 17:29 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 15 Aug 2018, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
>>
But maybe you are using mode delphi ? If so, try separating out the
object
definition in a separate unit which is not compiled in delphi mode.
>>> A global ope
Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
Am 15.08.2018 um 10:59 schrieb Dennis:
Why class operator is accepted for advanced records but not old
fashion object???
Because objects are not records. Internally they are handled more
closely to classes than records.
Would it be too hard to also implement
Am 15.08.2018 um 17:29 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
But maybe you are using mode delphi ? If so, try separating out the
object
definition in a separate unit which is not compiled in delphi mode.
A global operator won't help at all as (c
