On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 6:26 PM, Marcos Douglas B. Santos
wrote:
> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 6:05 PM, leledumbo via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>>> Create a call that calls Application.Terminate.
>>
>> I just call DumpHeap(false); instead
>
> Where is this function or method? Could you give so more informat
On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 6:05 PM, leledumbo via fpc-pascal
wrote:
>> Create a call that calls Application.Terminate.
>
> I just call DumpHeap(false); instead
Where is this function or method? Could you give so more information
how is this works with heaptrc?
About my test, do you have the same mem
Am 05.05.2018 um 19:53 schrieb Tomas Hajny:
On Sat, May 5, 2018 19:23, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
Hi Sven,
.
.
(e.g. "MyUnits" or "FCL.XML" or "FCL.Web.Base"). Like with all similar
-F parameters -FN only takes a single value, but can be specified
multiple times.
.
.
I'm not s
> Any ideas how to identify potential unintentional loops?
That depends on your design. Is it intended that the 3 procedures can call
each other, directly or indirectly? If no, then things are a lot easier. You
can just put on the currently entered procedure name to a map shared by the
3 (or just
> Create a call that calls Application.Terminate.
I just call DumpHeap(false); instead
--
Sent from: http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mai
On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 5 May 2018, Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote:
>
>> I'm using fpWeb in standalone mode (fphttpapp unit) to develop and debug.
>> I would like to see the heaptrc log in the end, as we can do in normal
>> desktop applications.
>>
Sorry guys, I've just forgot to setup in Lazarus, Config and Target this:
-Twin64 _AND_ -Px86_64 parameters.
In the first time, I just set -Twin32 but -P stayed "(default)":|
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://list
I have a script for a long time that I use to compile FPC from sources.
Today I'm configuring a new machine and I would like to use this
script to configure FPC and Lazarus — I have another script for
Lazarus as well.
I've compiled FPC with no errors using this script. I use
`crossinstall` too. Ag
In our previous episode, Marcos Douglas B. Santos said:
> wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > In FPC we currently don't use dotted unit names much, but maybe that will
> > change in the future.
>
> Would be good if all units could be prefixed to make a pattern, like
> `fpc.web, fpc.xml, ...` but I know that
On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Vojtěch Čihák wrote:
> i,
>
> LCLIntf, LCLProc, LCLType isn't enough? I will use dotted units only if
> there will be absolutely no other way around.
There are many others without LCL prefix...
> I believe it can be useful but I don't think it's "must have" (when
i,
LCLIntf, LCLProc, LCLType isn't enough? I will use dotted units only if there
will be absolutely no other way around.
I believe it can be useful but I don't think it's "must have" (when I don't
consider Delphi compat.).
V.
__
O
On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 4:40 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
wrote:
> [...]
>
> In FPC we currently don't use dotted unit names much, but maybe that will
> change in the future.
Would be good if all units could be prefixed to make a pattern, like
`fpc.web, fpc.xml, ...` but I know that we need to ma
In our previous episode, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal said:
>
> In FPC we currently don't use dotted unit names much, but maybe that will
> change in the future.
Afaik FV and LCL have conflicts.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
On 05/05/18 21:15, James Richters wrote:
I'm having an issue with one of my programs that I suspect is being caused by a
recursive loop... in simplified form... something like this:
Procedure Proc1;Begin Proc2;End;Procedure Proc2;Begin Proc1;End;
I ended up getting a runtime error and the re
In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said:
> He meant:
> If you use units with namespaces and you can't use the -FN option, then
> it becomes cumbersome to write them. Then a unit directive would be
> nice to have.
Yes, but both the directive and the uses would be a modification anyway.
I ca
> On May 6, 2018, at 2:40 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> The namespaces in Object Pascal are merely a convenience thing. E.g. Delphi
> prefixed many of the existing units (like SysUtils became System.SysUtils,
> Windows became WinApi.Windows and Forms became VCL.Forms (or so)). T
Tomas Hajny schrieb am Sa., 5. Mai 2018, 19:52:
> On Sat, May 5, 2018 19:23, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
>
>
> Hi Sven,
>
> .
> .
> > (e.g. "MyUnits" or "FCL.XML" or "FCL.Web.Base"). Like with all similar
> > -F parameters -FN only takes a single value, but can be specified
> > multiple ti
Ryan Joseph schrieb am So., 6. Mai 2018, 09:16:
>
>
> > On May 6, 2018, at 1:46 PM, Mattias Gaertner
> wrote:
> >
> > He meant:
> > If you use units with namespaces and you can't use the -FN option, then
> > it becomes cumbersome to write them. Then a unit directive would be
> > nice to have.
>
Ben Grasset schrieb am So., 6. Mai 2018, 03:16:
> Cool I guess. Kind of seems not very important at all though. FPC lacks
> compatibility with current Delphi in various other far more significant
> areas...
>
It was something that was relatively easy to implement and what some people
complained
> On May 6, 2018, at 1:46 PM, Mattias Gaertner
> wrote:
>
> He meant:
> If you use units with namespaces and you can't use the -FN option, then
> it becomes cumbersome to write them. Then a unit directive would be
> nice to have.
But does FPC have actual namespaces besides prefixing unit name
20 matches
Mail list logo
