> On Mar 8, 2018, at 1:48 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
> You could use an include file containing both the declaration and
> implementation controlled by compiler defines together with a macro for the
> type name.
That’s a nice trick. If those records get adopted something “man
2018-03-08 7:48 GMT+01:00 Sven Barth via fpc-pascal <
fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org>:
> You could use an include file containing both the declaration and
> implementation controlled by compiler defines together with a macro for the
> type name.
>
Very improper and totally bad approach. This is
2018-03-08 4:13 GMT+01:00 Ryan Joseph :
> 1) Given the example below we have a template for a standard ref counted
> record. Shouldn’t there be some “meta record” type that implements this
> automatically? I’m thinking about adding this to some types but the idea of
> recreating this same template
Am 08.03.2018 04:44 schrieb "Ryan Joseph" :
1) Given the example below we have a template for a standard ref counted
record. Shouldn’t there be some “meta record” type that implements this
automatically? I’m thinking about adding this to some types but the idea of
recreating this same template eve
So in the trunk we have managed records now which is a brilliant addition and
long overdue. Some questions these bring up:
1) Given the example below we have a template for a standard ref counted
record. Shouldn’t there be some “meta record” type that implements this
automatically? I’m thinking
