I still can not enter anything there that is accepted.
For example: Writeln('def'+'@abc.com');
gives an error. No matter what I enter there it just gives an error
"Anti-abuse result is wrong.". Small letters, capital letters,
semicolon, simple letters, all variations of the above, does not matte
Am 16.01.2018 22:58 schrieb "Rainer Stratmann" :
Am Dienstag, 16. Januar 2018, 22:41:34 schrieb Sven Barth via fpc-pascal:
> This won't work in the more diverse
> Linux world where users are more free to decide.
But if you take a closer look at this (diverse) that is some kind of pseudo
free and
On 2018-01-16 22:00, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Instead of they are fighting against each other
who has the better window manager.
And that is what I love, and why we have such great Linux desktop
environments. Competition drives innovation. Just compare it to the cr*p
Windows 10 interface or M
On 2018-01-16 21:41, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
Because here Apple simply enforced it. This won't work in the more diverse
Linux world where users are more free to decide.
I fully agree. And explains why all previous attempts and such "app
bundles" have not succeeded in the Linux space.
Am Dienstag, 16. Januar 2018, 22:41:34 schrieb Sven Barth via fpc-pascal:
> This won't work in the more diverse
> Linux world where users are more free to decide.
But if you take a closer look at this (diverse) that is some kind of pseudo
free and decide.
It would be technical no such problem to
Am 16.01.2018 20:41 schrieb "Graeme Geldenhuys" <
mailingli...@geldenhuys.co.uk>:
On 2018-01-16 06:51, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
> So, yeah, I'm definitely skeptical about such approaches.
>
All valid points. But if it was such a big concern, then why was Apple
happy to go with it. Maybe
Technically the anti-abuse field would produce the output of: Fatal Syntax
error, ";" expected but "identifier WRITELN" found
because there is no semicolon following the sample code. :DI guess maybe
it's after an if statement and before an else so it doesn't need a semicolon?
Silliness as
On 2018-01-16 20:08, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
And the key is to try to generate as less dependencies as possible.
Yup! Welcome to my world [see fpGUI Toolkit]. ;-)
Regards,
Graeme
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
http://fpgui.sourceforge.net/
My public
Am Dienstag, 16. Januar 2018, 19:41:38 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
> On 2018-01-16 06:51, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
> > So, yeah, I'm definitely skeptical about such approaches.
>
> All valid points. But if it was such a big concern, then why was Apple
> happy to go with it. Maybe the concer
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2018-01-16 06:51, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
So, yeah, I'm definitely skeptical about such approaches.
All valid points. But if it was such a big concern, then why was Apple
happy to go with it.
I think because Apple's base system is
On 2018-01-16 06:51, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
So, yeah, I'm definitely skeptical about such approaches.
All valid points. But if it was such a big concern, then why was Apple
happy to go with it. Maybe the concern is not so bad. As for bigger apps
(due to bundled dependencies) Tha
OK, WTH am I supposed to enter into the anti-abuse field?
I tried a few dozen variations of everything and nothing is accepted.
I might be too old and senile :) can we get some small explanation there?
AB
PS: BTW, Great work guys on pas2js
On 01/15/2018 07:42 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I posted a poll on the forum site, regarding missing language features in
pas2js.
http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,39694.0.html
Please, let us know what you think.
Michael.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepasc
Am Dienstag, 16. Januar 2018, 07:51:27 schrieb Sven Barth via fpc-pascal:
> Maybe because each app will have its own dependencies, thus duplicating
> code.
> Also if you have different versions of dependencies they might access
> shared global configuration in incompatible ways.
> Not to mention th
14 matches
Mail list logo
