Hi,
SourceForge gives checksums, too:
Cheers,
Benito
Am 30.11.2017 um 15:47 schrieb Tomas Hajny:
On Thu, November 30, 2017 15:32, kardan wrote:
Wow, both of you managed to avoid my actual question. :)
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 13:00:07 +0100
kardan wrote:
How can I verify those downloads
Hi Florian!
I would like to work on this patch, can you share it with me?
Thank you,
Michael
Am 03.12.17 um 19:05 schrieb Florian Klämpfl:
Am 29.11.2017 um 06:36 schrieb Christo:
On Sun, 2017-11-26 at 17:19 +0100, Michael Ring wrote:
I am looking for an easy way to have all cortex-m compil
On 12/03/2017 11:44 PM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Sun, December 3, 2017 22:10, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
On 12/02/2017 10:50 PM, Lubomír Čabla wrote:
Hi,
FPC 3.0.2
function get_segment_base_address(d : word) : longint;
function set_segment_base_address(d : word;s : longint) : boolean;
FPC 3.0.4
On Sun, December 3, 2017 18:49, kardan wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 00:33:04 +0100
> "Tomas Hajny" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, December 1, 2017 00:55, kardan wrote:
>> .
>> .
>> > In your case it would be probably enough to
>> > sha256sum $FILES > SHA256SUMS.txt
>> > gpg --sign SHA256SUMS.txt
>>
>> Sorry
On Sun, December 3, 2017 19:56, kardan wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 18:59:40 +0100
> Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>
>> > If your server is able to host files you will be able to generate a
>> > checksum file *anywhere* and put it onto it.
>>
>> Yes, if somebody with shell access to the server finds to ti
On Sun, December 3, 2017 22:10, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
> On 12/02/2017 10:50 PM, Lubomír Čabla wrote:
Hi,
>> FPC 3.0.2
>>
>> function get_segment_base_address(d : word) : longint;
>> function set_segment_base_address(d : word;s : longint) : boolean;
>>
>> FPC 3.0.4
>>
>> function get_segment_bas
In our previous episode, Nikolay Nikolov said:
> >
> > function get_segment_base_address(d : word) : longint;
> > function set_segment_base_address(d : word;s : dword) : boolean;
> >
> > For get_segment_base_address is correct longint or dword?
> I think (and I'm the one, who made the change) dword
On 12/02/2017 10:50 PM, Lubomír Čabla wrote:
Hi,
in new version 3.0.4 you have changed the declaration of some
procedures and functions in the go32 unit.
It does not matter, but I see a little mismatch for linear base address:
FPC 3.0.2
function get_segment_base_address(d : word) : longin
On 2017-12-03 18:56, kardan wrote:
Let's hope someone privileged puts attached file into
https://sourceforge.net/projects/freepascal/files/Source/3.0.4
I got the same downloads from ftp.freepascal.org and ran the shasum
utility against those. I can confirm your SHA256 values are correct.
[F
Am 03.12.2017 um 19:54 schrieb code dz:
> 2017-12-03 18:59 UTC+01:00, Florian Klämpfl :
>> Am 03.12.2017 um 18:49 schrieb kardan:
>>> Apart from that, do
>>> you imply, that you intend to burden programmers with work the release
>>> team should have done?
>>
>> Which release team? We are happy that
On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 18:59:40 +0100
Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> > If your server is able to host files you will be able to generate a
> > checksum file *anywhere* and put it onto it.
>
> Yes, if somebody with shell access to the server finds to time to set
> this up.
Let's hope someone privileged
2017-12-03 18:59 UTC+01:00, Florian Klämpfl :
> Am 03.12.2017 um 18:49 schrieb kardan:
>> Apart from that, do
>> you imply, that you intend to burden programmers with work the release
>> team should have done?
>
> Which release team? We are happy that we managed within 3 month to find
> people bein
Am 29.11.2017 um 06:36 schrieb Christo:
> On Sun, 2017-11-26 at 17:19 +0100, Michael Ring wrote:
>> I am looking for an easy way to have all cortex-m compilers available
>> at the same time to be able to do automated building/testing
>
> There is a similar problem with the AVR target having severa
Am 03.12.2017 um 18:53 schrieb kardan:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 18:36:09 +0100
> Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>
>> Yes. And I were pointing out that your script does not help much as
>> it is debian/linux only while we create releases for several
>> different OSes.
>
> Does this mean, you are not able to
Am 03.12.2017 um 18:49 schrieb kardan:
> Apart from that, do
> you imply, that you intend to burden programmers with work the release
> team should have done?
Which release team? We are happy that we managed within 3 month to find people
being able, willing
and having the resources to build and u
On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 18:36:09 +0100
Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> Yes. And I were pointing out that your script does not help much as
> it is debian/linux only while we create releases for several
> different OSes.
Does this mean, you are not able to run bash scripts? Or you
cannot find tools to genera
On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 00:33:04 +0100
"Tomas Hajny" wrote:
> On Fri, December 1, 2017 00:55, kardan wrote:
> .
> .
> > In your case it would be probably enough to
> > sha256sum $FILES > SHA256SUMS.txt
> > gpg --sign SHA256SUMS.txt
>
> Sorry, but I'm afraid that you miss the point
In what way?
On 03/12/17 17:36, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 03.12.2017 um 18:20 schrieb kardan:
On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 21:02:30 +0100
Florian Klämpfl wrote:
And? FPC is not debian/linux only.
If you are using windows I recommend to use a one of the many checksum
tools to verify downloaded files.> But for that
Am 03.12.2017 um 18:20 schrieb kardan:
> On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 21:02:30 +0100
> Florian Klämpfl wrote:
>
>> And? FPC is not debian/linux only.
>
> If you are using windows I recommend to use a one of the many checksum
> tools to verify downloaded files.> But for that, releases must publish
> checks
On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 21:02:30 +0100
Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> And? FPC is not debian/linux only.
If you are using windows I recommend to use a one of the many checksum
tools to verify downloaded files. But for that, releases must publish
checksums for those files first. Another option is to downloa
20 matches
Mail list logo
