On 02.08.2017 09:29, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
FPC "forces" nothing. It offers a single-byte string TStrings
implementation.
If you want to use that for Unicode, you indeed have no choice but to
use UTF8
or use/write a separate class that uses UTF16.
That is why I said that it is less sil
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 10:52:35 -0600
Ryan Joseph wrote:
>[...]
Note that "inline" functions in FPC have a different meaning:
https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progsu36.html
What you mean are "anonymous functions" or "closures".
State in FPC:
http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-devel
I’m seeing feature this in other languages and it’s pretty useful. Has anyone
ever considered this for Pascal?
Instead of declaring a method in the class (or other function) it’s written
inline from the callers scope and inherits from that scope. The only advantage
is readability since everythi
In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said:
> >[...]
> > ftp://freepascal.stack.nl/pub/mirrors/fpc/beta/3.0.4-rc1/
>
> The fpc-3.0.4-0.rc1.x86_64.rpm does not work on Fedora 21 x86_64:
>
> Free Pascal Compiler version 3.0.4rc1 [2017/07/02] for x86_64
> Copyright (c) 1993-2017 by Florian Klaem
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:44:55 +0200 (CEST)
mar...@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
>[...]
> ftp://freepascal.stack.nl/pub/mirrors/fpc/beta/3.0.4-rc1/
The fpc-3.0.4-0.rc1.x86_64.rpm does not work on Fedora 21 x86_64:
Free Pascal Compiler version 3.0.4rc1 [2017/07/02] for x86_64
Copyright (c) 1
