Thanks.That's exactly what I need.22.07.2017, 20:20, "Maciej Izak" :2017-07-22 19:05 GMT+02:00 denisgolovan :So the question is why it's so difficult to build fpc compiler/rtl in debug mode?
Is it possible to fix? Or maybe I miss some official way?You don't need to edit Make
On 2017-07-22 21:50, Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote:
I would like to know if there is a way to abort all other test and an
specific one fail. I mean, if some "special tests" fail, will be a
waste of time to continue.
There is such functionality in FPTest (the DUnit2 fork for Free Pascal).
Take
On Sat, 22 Jul 2017, Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote:
Hi,
I'm using FPCUnit and DUnit to test code.
I would like to know if there is a way to abort all other test and an
specific one fail. I mean, if some "special tests" fail, will be a
waste of time to continue.
No, there currently is not.
Hi,
I'm using FPCUnit and DUnit to test code.
I would like to know if there is a way to abort all other test and an
specific one fail. I mean, if some "special tests" fail, will be a
waste of time to continue.
Best regards,
Marcos Douglas
___
fpc-pascal
2017-07-22 19:05 GMT+02:00 denisgolovan :
> So the question is why it's so difficult to build fpc compiler/rtl in
> debug mode?
> Is it possible to fix? Or maybe I miss some official way?
>
You don't need to edit Makefile.fpc. When I need debug info for rtl and
packages I use this:
make clean al
Hi all
Currently I am debugging a nasty shared memory bug.
More specifically it's related to memory allocator, though not directly.
More to the point - lack of backtraces is really tough - Lazarus debugger just
shows one level.
Upon some investigation I managed to get much more meaningful backt
Michael, no I don't. I use
https://github.com/sysrpl/Bare.Game/blob/master/source/bare.interop.sdl2.pas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Hello Florian,
2017-07-22 13:49 GMT+01:00 Florian Klämpfl :
> Am 22.07.2017 um 14:47 schrieb Matias Vara:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am not sure why my executable does not contains a .debug_aranges
> section. It contains .debug_line
> > and .debug_info. Am I missing some linker flags?
> >
>
> Maybe not
Am 22.07.2017 um 14:47 schrieb Matias Vara:
> Hello,
>
> I am not sure why my executable does not contains a .debug_aranges section.
> It contains .debug_line
> and .debug_info. Am I missing some linker flags?
>
Maybe not included by the linker script?
Hello,
I am not sure why my executable does not contains a .debug_aranges section.
It contains .debug_line and .debug_info. Am I missing some linker flags?
Thanks, Matias.
2017-07-19 0:05 GMT+01:00 Matias Vara :
> Hello Charlie and thanks for the comments. I ended up by implementing my
> own In
On 19.07.2017 18:58, Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR) wrote:
You are free to implement Semaphore-alike behavior using
CriticalSections for example, which are implemented on all platforms
which support Threading in the FPC RTL.
CriticalSection is the windows-name for Futex, and in Windows (10) the
On 19.07.2017 18:29, Anthony Walter wrote:
As a note to this, I am using semaphores quite a bit in SDL2 ...
Do you use Jedi-SDL to combine fpc and SDL ?
-Michael
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.or
12 matches
Mail list logo