> On May 22, 2017, at 9:24 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> I saw Florian worked hard last weekend, and the new value is 23.0 - 23.6
> (was 19.1 - 19.5) for x86_64. Sometimes floating point division by zero.
>
> and for x86 10.8 but half of the time I get an exception (ctrl-C ??!?!) here.
Tha
Hi,
If you have some apps or components which was written in Object Pascal and
you would like to use them in Web applications (client-side, previously
installed) what is the best option to choose nowadays?
My users use Windows so, I thought in ActiveX. It works, but I think Chrome
do not use anym
I realized I should have posted this in fpc-other. So, please reply in
[fpc-other] and not here.
On 05/23/2017 03:03 AM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
On 05/23/2017 01:20 AM, nore...@z505.com wrote:
On 2017-05-18 19:54, Ryan Joseph wrote:
On May 18, 2017, at 10:40 PM, Jon Foster
wrote:
62.44
On 05/23/2017 01:20 AM, nore...@z505.com wrote:
On 2017-05-18 19:54, Ryan Joseph wrote:
On May 18, 2017, at 10:40 PM, Jon Foster
wrote:
62.44 1.33 1.33 fpc_frac_real
26.76 1.90 0.57 MATH_$$_FLOOR$EXTENDED$$LONGINT
10.33 2.12 0.22 FPC_DIV_INT64
Thanks for profili
>Here is a simple sample program that has the issue for me on both my windows
>10 desktop and my windows 10 laptop, both are 64bit.
>https://hastebin.com/nubonozaho.pas
I started thinking about this, and did some more tests, and I think I have
narrowed down what is really happening, but not sure
On 2017-05-18 10:12, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2017-05-18 16:04, Ryan Joseph wrote:
After I looked at the code I didn't see anything strange about it
Thank you, that's what I thought too.
it just got me thinking, if that code can be that slow how slow is
all the stuff I’m writing on a dail
On 2017-05-18 19:54, Ryan Joseph wrote:
On May 18, 2017, at 10:40 PM, Jon Foster
wrote:
62.44 1.33 1.33 fpc_frac_real
26.76 1.90 0.57 MATH_$$_FLOOR$EXTENDED$$LONGINT
10.33 2.12 0.22 FPC_DIV_INT64
Thanks for pr
On 2017-05-19 05:25, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2017-05-19 06:58, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Over the weekend I’ll verify by testing on both FreeBSD and Windows,
and
then see if “calling conventions” make any difference.
*BSD is the same as Linux.
Good to know, thanks.
It has its purposes, b
On 2017-05-19 06:16, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2017-05-18 16:33, Reimar Grabowski wrote:
and JS is clearly not faster than FPC.
The JavaScript version runs very smooth on my system. There is no
framerate counter though, so I don't know how much faster.
http://jsdo.it/notch/dB1E
Again, w
On 2017-05-19 06:32, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Bottom line is, with the exact same code, NO work-arounds is required
for GCC or Java! So why must we have work-arounds for FPC? It's a
compiler or RTL issue - not being able to understand the code good
enough to generate more efficient binaries.
Ag
>I cannot reproduce it on my machine after the r714 fix. Can you send me a
>small example program, that demonstrates the problem, as well as detailed
>steps to reproduce?
Here is a simple sample program that has the issue for me on both my windows 10
desktop and my windows 10 laptop, both are 6
Hi,
On Mon, 22 May 2017, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
> Today, I checked whether we can take advantage of this optimization for
> floats, but I didn't see any load-modify-store instructions in the x86
> instruction set (neither x87, nor SSE/AVX). Are there any floating point
> instructions on any archi
Am 22.05.2017 um 19:34 schrieb Nikolay Nikolov:
>
>
> On 05/20/2017 12:07 AM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/19/2017 11:24 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
>>> On 19.05.2017 19:22, Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR) wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 19 May 2017, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrot
On 05/22/2017 02:21 AM, James Richters wrote:
I have the window title working, Thank you for that.
However I still have the same issue with non-responsive keyboard when I return
to the graph window after an ALT-TAB. I am running on windows 10 64bit -
program compiled for win32.
I cannot repr
On 05/20/2017 12:07 AM, Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
On 05/19/2017 11:24 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
On 19.05.2017 19:22, Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR) wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 19 May 2017, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
I think Jeppe wanted to add vector support. Though the question
here i
In our previous episode, Marco van de Voort said:
>
> i386:
> just compile : 7.9 (both 3.0.2 and 3.1.1)
> -O4 3.0.2: 8.2 3.1.1: 8.1
> -O4 -Opcoreavx2 -Cfavx2 -Cpcoreavx2 3.0.2 8.35 3.1.1 : 12.1
>
>
> x64: only 3.1.1, sometimes divide by zero (have to set exception mask?)
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
