@Michael and @Marco,
Very helpful comments, thank you!
Regarding,
>
>
in subversion. See
> http://www.freepascal.org/develop.var
> Section 'Other repositories'
Yes, found it. (Tex, I thought so (considering the nicely formatted pdf)).
- In prog.pdf there is a section about "Compiler and RTL s
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
> > why it builds fpmake-executables to do so? (Really ignorant: and why e.g.
> > there isn't 'just a hypothetical github-package-project' which can be
> > cloned, built and installed)? Is there any docu, discussion about this
> > subject?
>
> the
On 02/03/17 06:00, Bo Berglund wrote:
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 22:04:26 +0100, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 01/03/17 21:55, Bo Berglund wrote:>> Am I still supposed to use 2.6.4 as compiler to build 3.0.2?>> I
am getting an error about the "seed" compiler when I try to build>> 3.0.2 with a 3.x
compiler
On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Hans-Peter Suter wrote:
I couldn't find the source for the manuals, e.g. [prog.pdf](
http://www.freepascal.org/docs.var). Does someone know where I can find
them?
in subversion. See
http://www.freepascal.org/develop.var
Section 'Other repositories'
Some other questio
I couldn't find the source for the manuals, e.g. [prog.pdf](
http://www.freepascal.org/docs.var). Does someone know where I can find
them?
Some other questions:
- In prog.pdf there is a section about "Compiler and RTL source tree
structure". Is there some documentation about the (not-mentioned
In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said:
>
> Why do I need fpc 3.0.0 to build 3.0.3?
> Shouldn't that be 3.0.2?
Fixed.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
