On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 12:43 PM, José Mejuto wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Today I had detected that some emails does not reach me in this mailing
list, in fact the last ones from "leledumbo" about JSON parsing, but Graeme
and Michael ones arrive successfully
I've had the same problem (I'm using Gmail
In our previous episode, leledumbo said:
> > Nono: the test is correct.
> > fcl-json gives an error, but in your test result it shows up as accepting
> > it ?
>
> Eh? Will need to recheck. The requirement is clear:
>
> - 0 for accept
> - 1 for reject
> - >1 for crash
>
> Could it be one of the
On Tue, 1 Nov 2016, leledumbo wrote:
Nono: the test is correct.
fcl-json gives an error, but in your test result it shows up as accepting
it ?
Eh? Will need to recheck. The requirement is clear:
- 0 for accept
- 1 for reject
- >1 for crash
I understood that. I got 1 for the indicated test
> Nono: the test is correct.
> fcl-json gives an error, but in your test result it shows up as accepting
> it ?
Eh? Will need to recheck. The requirement is clear:
- 0 for accept
- 1 for reject
- >1 for crash
Could it be one of the two except block is wrongly executed?
--
View this message
Hi,
Can the discussion about NNTP advantages/disadvantages please be moved
to fpc-other, as Tomas asked near the start of this thread?
Thanks.
Jonas
FPC mailing lists admin
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freep
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:12:12PM +0100, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> Am 30.10.2016 um 19:11 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
> > On 2016-10-30 17:24, Sven Barth wrote:
> >> Same here...
> >
> > First Lazarus, now FPC. Can we not switch fpc-pascal to a NNTP newsgroup
>
> I used NNTP years ago the last tim
On 2016-10-31 20:55, Ralf Quint wrote:
> is the issue of attachments and posting
> messages with screenshots for example, which doesn't work (well) on
> usenet either
I'm not talking about Usenet - I stopped using that years ago. I host a
private NNTP server, like many other companies do. In th
On 2016-10-31 20:50, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> NNTP passed its heyday
I believe NNTP is still just as relevant as the day it was invented. It
follows the Unix philosophy. It was designed of a specific need, and is
very good at what it does - group communications. It doesn't need HTML
or Emojis,
On 2016-10-31 20:12, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> How does marking read messages work when reading a group with
> multiple devices (mobile, tablet, notebook, pc)?
If you are anything like me, I absolutely hate typing on mobile devices
like phones or tablets - it's just to frustrating and slow. So I on
