Hello Marco.
> Do you see differences between ppas.sh and link.res with and without
> smartlinking ohter than --gc-sections?
For link.res => no differences.
For ppas.sh => only "--gc-section" was added.
> If you compile without smartlinking but with -s and add --gc-sections
> to the ppas.sh fil
On 2016-10-19 13:25, fredvs wrote:
> Huh, I decided to forget FreeBSD...
NNOooo!;-)
Regards,
Graeme
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:36:05 +0200
Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On Linux, kcallgrind or oprofile, I guess (make sure to compile your
> code with -gv for both).
Thanks, will give them a try.
R.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http
Reimar Grabowski wrote on Wed, 19 Oct 2016:
What do people use to profile their programs?
On Linux, kcallgrind or oprofile, I guess (make sure to compile your
code with -gv for both).
Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepasca
Hello Marco.
Huh, I decided to forget FreeBSD but ok I will re-install it and test your
propositions.
Write you later.
Fre;D
-
Many thanks ;-)
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Smart-link-in-FreeBSD-multi-arch-tp5726375p5726636.html
Sent fr
In our previous episode, fredvs said:
> > Just curious. If you don't compile with Smart-Linking enabled, does your
> binary then run fine?
>
> Yes, without Smart-linking, a 32 bit fpc application runs fine in a
> multi-arch 64 bit system.
> With Smart-linking a 32 bit application runs fine only i
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 07:39:30 +0200
Jonas Maebe wrote:
> Reimar Grabowski wrote:
> > are there any known problems with gprof?
>
> No, but on the other hand it's not something that many people use
What do people use to profile their programs?
> On which platform?
Sorry, Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit
