On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, African Wild Dog wrote:
2016-07-19 4:52 GMT-03:00 Michael Van Canneyt :
1. The whole point of TFPHTTPClient is exactly to couple it to sockets
framework (fcl-net).
If you want to use synapse, use httpsend. lnet has a similar component
for the http protocol.
2016-07-19 4:52 GMT-03:00 Michael Van Canneyt :
>
> 1. The whole point of TFPHTTPClient is exactly to couple it to sockets
>framework (fcl-net).
>If you want to use synapse, use httpsend. lnet has a similar component
>for the http protocol.
>
>
I dont want to use synapse. I am developi
Hello,
You could always send a patch with a TFPGHashedMap or TFPGRedBlackMap
implementation.
thanks,
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pas
Hello,
This will not be applied, for 2 reasons:
1. The whole point of TFPHTTPClient is exactly to couple it to sockets
framework (fcl-net).
If you want to use synapse, use httpsend. lnet has a similar component
for the http protocol.
2. I favour the opposite approach. Abstract out the
Hello,
The current version of the TFPHTTPClient (the one shipped with fpc 3.0) is
coupled to the fpc's sockets framework (fcl-net) so we can't utilize other
tcp connection framework (e.g Synapse) to perform HTTP requests using
TFPHTTPClient.
I have made an improvement to the TFPHTTPClient class (
