On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 09:25:56 -0400,
wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
>On 07/14/2016 08:31 AM, Bo Berglund wrote:
>[...]
>> But this line:
>> OurZipper.Entries.AddFileEntry(ParamStr(I), ParamStr(I));
>>
>> seems to add the files to zip into some kind of internal list.
>> Why does it take the same arg
Lukasz Sokol wrote:
On 13/07/16 08:31, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Please excuse one of my regular silly questions. Elsewhere, a (former) Delphi programmer
is uneasy having found that his binaries have had embedded SQL que
On 07/14/2016 08:31 AM, Bo Berglund wrote:
[...]
But this line:
OurZipper.Entries.AddFileEntry(ParamStr(I), ParamStr(I));
seems to add the files to zip into some kind of internal list.
Why does it take the same argument twice?
i found the following in the interface section of zipper.pp
TZip
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, Bo Berglund wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:32:38 +0200 (CEST), Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
Do you have an example of how to do the above with FPC ZLib?
You can find this almost verbatim in the examples of paszlib, using the
zipper unit.
The one I found is this (a co
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:32:38 +0200 (CEST), Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
>> Do you have an example of how to do the above with FPC ZLib?
>
>You can find this almost verbatim in the examples of paszlib, using the
>zipper unit.
>
The one I found is this (a command line utility):
uses
Zipper;
var
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, Bo Berglund wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:09:36 +0100, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
If you have the time, it might be worth abstracting out the zip reading
functionality so you can swap out the actual compression components used
as needed. This will allow your application t
On 2016-07-14 11:31, Bo Berglund wrote:
>
> function TSSCommHandler.ZipFiles(TargetFile: string; FileList:
> TStringList): boolean;
> var
> ZW: TZipWrite;
> i: integer;
> FileName: string;
> begin
> Result := false;
> ZW := TZipWrite.Create(TargetFile);
I would replace that with a Facto
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:09:36 +0100, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
>If you have the time, it might be worth abstracting out the zip reading
>functionality so you can swap out the actual compression components used
>as needed. This will allow your application to change compression tools
>in future, with
On 2016-07-14 07:22, Bo Berglund wrote:
> I have to contact Synopse, even though they seem not so responsive...
That seems to be the best option for you at the moment.
If you have the time, it might be worth abstracting out the zip reading
functionality so you can swap out the actual compression
On Thu, 14 Jul 2016, Bo Berglund wrote:
OK,
that was bad news for me because I have included the unit (PasZip from
Synopse) in order to make possible for my application to write
zipfiles containing measurement result files. I had a Windows specific
dll earlier and wanted to switch to multi-pl
10 matches
Mail list logo
