On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 6:17 AM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
>>
> First of all, inheritance is inherent in object oriented programming,
since
> every object descends from a base object.
> So saying that 'inheritance must die' is a stupid sentence or title for a
> blog.
Now I see what's happened.
M
Ched wrote:
Dear All,
I have to make linux-i386, linux-arm and win-xt computers to communicate
together for the instrumentation of a small farm of robotic telescops -
telescope control, camera control, image analysis and "chef
d'orchestre", with remote access.
What's win-xt in this context?
Dear All,
I have to make linux-i386, linux-arm and win-xt computers to communicate together for the instrumentation
of a small farm of robotic telescops - telescope control, camera control, image analysis and "chef
d'orchestre", with remote access.
Can I use the same sockets unit for linux an
> With regards to constraints, I tried them previously, but went back to test
them again realized that with class methods the constraint must be in the
method declaration of the class only.
This needs to be documented, I did the same mistake as you.
--
View this message in context:
http://fre
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015, Marcos Douglas wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
!! OMG !! Maybe we just discovered a new form of multiple inheritance...
Definite proof we should all use C++, or maybe it is time for C+++ !!
You have humor, very funny. [clap clap clap
