On 25/09/15 19:42, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Lukasz Sokol wrote:
This seems like a nice tutorial on X over SSH:
http://elinux.org/RPi_Remote_Access
(not tried myself YMMV)
I'd have expected all necessary keys etc. to have been set up by
default. Certainly with Raspbian I didn't have to create
Lukasz Sokol wrote:
On 25/09/15 16:13, Bo Berglund wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:30:10 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
Bo Berglund wrote:
If absolutely necessary I will have to set up the RPi with a monitor,
keyboard and mouse and install Lazarus and compile from there. But RPi
is not as pow
Bo Berglund wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:30:10 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
Bo Berglund wrote:
If absolutely necessary I will have to set up the RPi with a monitor,
keyboard and mouse and install Lazarus and compile from there. But RPi
is not as powerful a computer as the PC and it will p
On 25/09/15 16:13, Bo Berglund wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:30:10 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd
> wrote:
>
>> Bo Berglund wrote:
>>> If absolutely necessary I will have to set up the RPi with a monitor,
>>> keyboard and mouse and install Lazarus and compile from there. But RPi
>>> is not as powerfu
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:30:10 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
>Bo Berglund wrote:
>> If absolutely necessary I will have to set up the RPi with a monitor,
>> keyboard and mouse and install Lazarus and compile from there. But RPi
>> is not as powerful a computer as the PC and it will probably be ve
Em 24/09/2015 18:02, "Mattias Gaertner"
escreveu:
>
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:21:31 +0100
> Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>
> > On 2015-09-24 16:14, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > Is lazbuild a pure console application?
>
> Yes.
>
> > If so, no problem, but my guess
> > is that it still uses the LCL so
In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said:
> Yes. I see invalid UTF-8 file names on Linux systems often (cannot be
> converted to UTF-16).
>
> Are invalid UTF-16 file names under Windows really a practical
> problem?
> What program allows to create invalid UTF-16 file names?
> With "invalid U
On 2015-09-25 12:47, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>> > (Now lets better not start about the encoding of Filenames on non-Windows
>> > OS... :-))
> BSD/Linux afaik has the same problem. The filesystem is binary, not textual.
> The textual aspect is only interpretation.
Under FreeBSD and Solaris, when
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 13:47:22 +0200 (CEST)
mar...@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) wrote:
>[...]
> BSD/Linux afaik has the same problem. The filesystem is binary, not textual.
> The textual aspect is only interpretation.
Yes. I see invalid UTF-8 file names on Linux systems often (cannot be
converted
In our previous episode, Andreas Dorn said:
> Is it safe to pass the Filename to procedures from the RTL without risking
> corruption?
In theory no, but since mostly filenames will be passed to functions that
have the same assumptions, I assume the only problem is if you put such a
filename in a s
Andreas Dorn wrote on Fri, 25 Sep 2015:
If I understand that correctly, it stores the filename in a string that
has been tagged as valid UTF-16.
There are no tags for valid, invalid or unchecked UTF-16. A
unicodestring is basically a sequence of widechars. Some operations,
such as convert
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> It uses UTF16 on windows, not a codepage aware string.
> So if you use widestring for all your filename strings, there will be no
> problem. No conversions will happen.
If I understand that correctly, it stores the filename in a string that
has
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 11:16:55 +0200
Michael Schnell wrote:
On 09/25/2015 11:09 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
"Lazarus" is the name for two completely different things
... please don't introduce confusion where there is none.
I suppose this confusion already is ubiquitous (and
On 09/25/2015 11:32 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
I also ask you kindly to stop spreading FUD.
Sorry for triggering this nonsense-discussion :(
-Michael
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mail
If absolutely necessary I will have to set up the RPi with a monitor,
keyboard and mouse and install Lazarus and compile from there. But RPi
is not as powerful a computer as the PC and it will probably be very
slow if at all working
You can VNC to the RPi. The Pi 2 is much faster and wi
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 11:16:55 +0200
Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 09/25/2015 11:09 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
> >
> > > "Lazarus" is the name for two completely different things
> >
> > ... please don't introduce confusion where there is none.
> >
> I suppose this confusion already is ubiquitous (and min
On 09/25/2015 11:09 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
> "Lazarus" is the name for two completely different things
... please don't introduce confusion where there is none.
I suppose this confusion already is ubiquitous (and miner as the
"_first_name_" of the LCL *is* "Lazarus (Component Library)" ).
O
Am 25.09.2015 11:04 schrieb "Michael Schnell" :
>
> On 09/25/2015 03:52 AM, Bo Berglund wrote:
>>
>> If absolutely necessary I will have to set up the RPi with a monitor,
keyboard and mouse and install Lazarus and compile from there. But RPi is
not as powerful a computer as the PC and it will proba
On 09/25/2015 03:52 AM, Bo Berglund wrote:
If absolutely necessary I will have to set up the RPi with a monitor,
keyboard and mouse and install Lazarus and compile from there. But RPi
is not as powerful a computer as the PC and it will probably be very
slow if at all working
"Lazarus" is
David Emerson wrote on Thu, 24 Sep 2015:
Is there a way to detect what section of a unit the compiler is in,
rather than using these user-defined symbols?
No.
Ditto for initialization, finalization (although I use this much
less frequently)
No, there aren't any defines for that either.
Bo Berglund wrote:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:48:32 -0400, Bo Berglund
wrote:
I want to check my options regarding Lazarus and FPC.
If I develop a program on Windows Lazarus, move it to Debian Lazarus
(x86) and then finally want to compile on ARM on for example Raspberry
Pi but outside of Lazarus
David Emerson wrote:
I tried sending this message two days ago, but it seems not to have gone
through. Trying again.
I like using include files, to break up big units into multiple files,
and also as macro-based templates.
One thing I do frequently is to put both the interface and the
imple
On Friday 25 September 2015 10:26:44 Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> So if you use widestring for all your filename strings, there will be no
For better performance probably UnicodeString not WideString.
Martin
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists
Andreas Dorn wrote on Fri, 25 Sep 2015:
In the discussion about resourcestrings I read that the RTL now uses
codepage-aware strings for FileIO.
So I wonder what kind of codepages do you use for FileIO?
On Windows: UTF-16.
The Windows-documentation calls Filenames "opaque sequence of WCHAR
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015, Andreas Dorn wrote:
Hi there,
In the discussion about resourcestrings I read that the RTL now uses
codepage-aware strings for FileIO.
So I wonder what kind of codepages do you use for FileIO?
It uses UTF16 on windows, not a codepage aware string.
So if you use widest
Hi there,
In the discussion about resourcestrings I read that the RTL now uses
codepage-aware strings for FileIO.
So I wonder what kind of codepages do you use for FileIO?
The Windows-documentation calls Filenames "opaque sequence of WCHARs".
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/des
On 2015-09-25 02:52, Bo Berglund wrote:
> If absolutely necessary I will have to set up the RPi with a monitor,
> keyboard and mouse and install Lazarus and compile from there.
No need. Simply follow my instructions from my first reply in this
thread. Use the "show options" on your Linux system. S
27 matches
Mail list logo
